ArticlePloS one2023
Assessment of positive selection across SARS-CoV-2 variants via maximum likelihood.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Ways of the Virus: Interactions of Platelets and Red Blood Cells with SARS-CoV-2, and Their Potential Pathophysiological Significance in COVID-19.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study of the genome of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, particularly with regard to understanding evolution of the virus, is crucial for managing the COVID-19 pandemic. To this end, we sample viral genomes from the GISAID repository and use several of the maximum likelihood approaches implemented in PAML, a collection of open source programs for phylogenetic analyses of DNA and protein sequences, to assess evidence for positive selection in the protein-coding regions of the SARS-CoV-2 genome. Across all major variants identified by June 2021, we find limited evidence for positive selection. In particular, we identify positive selection in a small proportion of sites (5-15%) in the protein-coding region of the spike protein across variants. Most other variants did not show a strong signal for positive selection overall, though there were indications of positive selection in the Delta and Kappa variants for the nucleocapsid protein. We additionally use a forward selection procedure to fit a model that allows branch-specific estimates of selection along a phylogeny relating the variants, and find that there is variation in the selective pressure across variants for the spike protein. Our results highlight the utility of computational approaches for identifying genomic regions under selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.