Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37708113›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2023

Mixtures of strategies underlie rodent behavior during reversal learning.

Nhat Minh Le, Murat Yildirim, Yizhi Wang, Hiroki Sugihara, Mehrdad Jazayeri, Mriganka Sur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nhat Minh LeDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Murat YildirimPicower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0853-2557
Yizhi WangPicower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Hiroki SugiharaDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Mehrdad JazayeriDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9764-6961
Mriganka SurDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2442-5671

Funding

Neuron-astrocyte mechanisms of norepinephrine in goal-directed learningR01MH133066 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MRIGANKA SUR · 2023 to 2026
$2.6M
Astrocyte-Neuron Circuits Underlying Cortical Mechanisms of Learned BehaviorR01NS130361 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MRIGANKA SUR · 2022 to 2026
$2.1M
Spatiotemporal dynamics of locus coeruleus circuits during learned behaviorR01MH126351 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI SUR, MRIGANKA · 2021 to 2025
$2.1M
Developing next generation multiphoton systems to reveal cortico-thalamic interactions underlying short-term memory in behaving miceR00EB027706 · NIBIB · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI YILDIRIM, MURAT · 2022 to 2024
$747k
NIBIB NIH HHS R00 EB027706NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH126351NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH133066NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS130361
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In reversal learning tasks, the behavior of humans and animals is often assumed to be uniform within single experimental sessions to facilitate data analysis and model fitting. However, behavior of agents can display substantial variability in single experimental sessions, as they execute different blocks of trials with different transition dynamics. Here, we observed that in a deterministic reversal learning task, mice display noisy and sub-optimal choice transitions even at the expert stages of learning. We investigated two sources of the sub-optimality in the behavior. First, we found that mice exhibit a high lapse rate during task execution, as they reverted to unrewarded directions after choice transitions. Second, we unexpectedly found that a majority of mice did not execute a uniform strategy, but rather mixed between several behavioral modes with different transition dynamics. We quantified the use of such mixtures with a state-space model, block Hidden Markov Model (block HMM), to dissociate the mixtures of dynamic choice transitions in individual blocks of trials. Additionally, we found that blockHMM transition modes in rodent behavior can be accounted for by two different types of behavioral algorithms, model-free or inference-based learning, that might be used to solve the task. Combining these approaches, we found that mice used a mixture of both exploratory, model-free strategies and deterministic, inference-based behavior in the task, explaining their overall noisy choice sequences. Together, our combined computational approach highlights intrinsic sources of noise in rodent reversal learning behavior and provides a richer description of behavior than conventional techniques, while uncovering the hidden states that underlie the block-by-block transitions.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsReversal LearningAnimalsData AnalysisHumansMice

Identifiers

PMID37708113
PMCPMC10501641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.