Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37707703›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2024

Closing the loop: automation in anesthesiology is coming.

Sean Coeckelenbergh, Alexandre Joosten, Maxime Cannesson, Joseph Rinehart

Abstract readEditorialComment
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sean CoeckelenberghDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital Paul-Brousse, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, 12 avenue Paul Vaillant-Couturier, Villejuif, 94800, France. sean.coeckelenbergh@gmail.com.
Alexandre JoostenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital Paul-Brousse, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, 12 avenue Paul Vaillant-Couturier, Villejuif, 94800, France.
Maxime CannessonDepartment of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Joseph RinehartOutcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Funding

Personalized Risk Prediction for Prevention and Early Detection of Postoperative Failure to RescueR01EB035028 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Maxime Cannesson · 2023 to 2026
$2.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB035028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anesthesiology and intensive care medicine provide fertile ground for innovation in automation, but to date we have only achieved preliminary studies in closed-loop intravenous drug administration. Anesthesiologists have yet to implement these tools on a large scale despite clear evidence that they outperform manual titration. Closed-loops continuously assess a predefined variable as input into a controller and then attempt to establish equilibrium by administering a treatment as output. The aim is to decrease the error between the closed-loop controller's input and output. In this editorial we consider the available intravenous anesthesia closed-loop systems, try to clarify why they have not yet been implemented on a large scale, see what they offer, and propose the future steps towards automation in anesthesia.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaAnesthesiologyAnesthesia, IntravenousAutomationHumansInfusions, Intravenous

Identifiers

PMID37707703
PMCPMC12704449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.