Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37707675›Full record

Observational studyAdvances in therapy2023

Factors Associated with Topical Medication Instillation Failure in Glaucoma: VRAMS-QPiG Study.

Masaki Tanito, Mihoko Mochiji, Aika Tsutsui, Akiko Harano, Sho Ichioka, Yuji Takayanagi, Yumiko Kataoka, Yasutaka Takagi, Daisuke Shii

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Advances in therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Masaki TanitoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, 89-1 Enya, Izumo, Shimane, Japan. mtanito@med.shimane-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6512-7203
Mihoko MochijiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, 89-1 Enya, Izumo, Shimane, Japan.
Aika TsutsuiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, 89-1 Enya, Izumo, Shimane, Japan.
Akiko HaranoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, 89-1 Enya, Izumo, Shimane, Japan.
Sho IchiokaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, 89-1 Enya, Izumo, Shimane, Japan.
Yuji TakayanagiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, 89-1 Enya, Izumo, Shimane, Japan.
Yumiko KataokaJapan Medical Affairs Group, Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 4-20 Ofukacho, Kita-ku, Osaka, Japan.
Yasutaka TakagiJapan Medical Affairs Group, Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 4-20 Ofukacho, Kita-ku, Osaka, Japan.
Daisuke ShiiJapan Medical Affairs Group, Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 4-20 Ofukacho, Kita-ku, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo report eyedrop instillation techniques and factors associated with instillation failure among glaucoma subjects in the Video-Recorded Assessment of Medication Skill and Questionnaire-based evaluation of Perception in Glaucoma Study.

methodsIn this cross-sectional observational study, subjects were 60 patients with glaucoma (mean ± standard deviation age, 68.4 ± 11.3 years; 30 men) who required ocular hypotensive medication(s). Subjects completed ophthalmologic examinations and the Mini-Cog cognitive function test; their typical eyedrop instillation technique was video-recorded. Subjects rated their technique as successes/failures by questionnaire and two examiners rated the successes/failures based on video assessment. Discrepancy between self-reported and video-assessed success/failure rates of instillation was the main outcome measures. Multivariate logistic regression identified factors in instillation failure.

resultsOf 48/56 (86%) self-reported successes, 27/48 (56%) failed based on video assessment; as a result, 32/56 (57%) were inconsistent between subjective and objective assessments. Overall, 30/56 (54%) failed based on video assessment. In the subject-based data model, older age [odds ratio (OR) 0.93/year, P = 0.025] and lower cognitive function score (OR 2.7/score, P = 0.025) were factors in failed instillations. In the eye-based data model, less myopic objective refractive error (OR 0.77/diopter, P = 0.016) and lower visual field foveal threshold (OR 1.1/decibel, P = 0.041) were factors in failures.

conclusionIn addition to older age, decreased cognitive function, hyperopia, and decreased foveal sensitivity are risks for failed eyedrop instillation. Treating physicians can screen patients who require guidance by checking the risk factors of instillation failure rather than by relying on patient reports.

Indexed as

GlaucomaAgedAntihypertensive AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedOphthalmic SolutionsSurveys and QuestionnairesAntihypertensive AgentsOphthalmic SolutionsEyedrop instillation skillGlaucoma medicationHyperopiaImpaired cognitive functionMedication adherenceVisual field

Identifiers

PMID37707675
PMCPMC10567858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.