Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37707588›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2023

Prospective assessment of early developmental markers and their association with neuropsychological impairment.

Elisa Cainelli, Luca Vedovelli, Daniele Trevisanuto, Agnese Suppiej, Patrizia Bisiacchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Short-term effect of PMScientific reports · 2026
    Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elisa CainelliDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia, 8 - 35133, Padova, Italy. elisa.cainelli@unipd.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5039-4680
Luca VedovelliUnit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Daniele TrevisanutoDepartment of Woman and Child Health, University Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Agnese SuppiejDepartment of Medical Sciences, Pediatric Section, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Patrizia BisiacchiDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia, 8 - 35133, Padova, Italy.

Funding

European Union - NextGenerationEU and University of Padua under the 2021 STARS Grants@Unipd program UTOPICO
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Children who experience adversities in the pre-perinatal period are at increased risk of developing impairment later in life, despite the absence of overt brain and neurological abnormalities. However, many of these children exhibit sequelae several years after a period of normal appearance. As a result, the need for reliable developmental assessments for the early detection of infants at high risk of adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes has emerged. The Griffiths Mental Developmental Scales have a promising but poorly explored prognostic ability. This longitudinal study evaluated the predictive power of the Griffiths Mental Developmental Scales at 12 and 24 months on the cognitive and neuropsychological profile at 6 years of age in a sample of 70 children with a history of prematurity or perinatal asphyxia but without brain and neurological abnormalities. We found that the Griffiths Mental Developmental Scales at 24 months had good predictive ability on the intelligence quotient at 6 years and the capacity to predict some neuropsychological performances. On the other hand, the Griffiths Mental Developmental Scale at 12 months was not associated with the performance at 6 years or 24 months.   Conclusion: Data on brain development converge to indicate that the first two years of age represent a critical stage of development, particularly for children experiencing mild pre-perinatal adversities who are thought to exhibit white matter dysmaturity. For this reason, this age is crucial for identifying which children are at major risk, leaving enough time to intervene before overt deficits become apparent. Brain development in the first 2 years could explain the limited reliability of early neurodevelopmental testing. What is Known: • Pre-perinatal adversities increase the risk of developing neurodevelopmental disorders. • The predictive ability of the Griffith scale is poorly explored in low-grade conditions. What is New: • The predictive ability of the Griffith scale has been investigated in low-risk children. • A complete neuropsychological profile could offer a more accurate prediction than the intellectual quotient.

Indexed as

Infant, Newborn, DiseasesInfant, PrematureBrainChildDevelopmental DisabilitiesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLongitudinal StudiesProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsGriffiths Mental Developmental ScaleHypoxic ischemic encephalopathyNeonatalPerinatal asphyxiaPretermPsychomotor development

Identifiers

PMID37707588
PMCPMC10640515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.