Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37707548›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

Can multi-modal radiomics using pretreatment ultrasound and tomosynthesis predict response to neoadjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer?

Lie Cai, Chris Sidey-Gibbons, Juliane Nees, Fabian Riedel, Benedikt Schäfgen, Riku Togawa, Kristina Killinger, Joerg Heil, André Pfob, Michael Golatta

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Research on ultrasound-based radiomics: a bibliometric analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024
    Article
  13. Development and validation of ultrasound-based radiomics model to predict germline BRCA mutations in patients with breast cancer.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lie CaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Chris Sidey-GibbonsDepartment of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Juliane NeesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Fabian RiedelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Benedikt SchäfgenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Riku TogawaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Kristina KillingerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Joerg HeilDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
André Pfob *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. Andre.pfob@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6140-9895
Michael Golatta *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 440, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. michael.golatta@kse-hd.de.
Heidelberg University · DEThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesResponse assessment to neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NAST) to guide individualized treatment in breast cancer is a clinical research priority. We aimed to develop an intelligent algorithm using multi-modal pretreatment ultrasound and tomosynthesis radiomics features in addition to clinical variables to predict pathologic complete response (pCR) prior to the initiation of therapy.

methodsWe used retrospective data on patients who underwent ultrasound and tomosynthesis before starting NAST. We developed a support vector machine algorithm using pretreatment ultrasound and tomosynthesis radiomics features in addition to patient and tumor variables to predict pCR status (ypT0 and ypN0). Findings were compared to the histopathologic evaluation of the surgical specimen. The main outcome measures were area under the curve (AUC) and false-negative rate (FNR).

resultsWe included 720 patients, 504 in the development set and 216 in the validation set. Median age was 51.6 years and 33.6% (242 of 720) achieved pCR. The addition of radiomics features significantly improved the performance of the algorithm (AUC 0.72 to 0.81; p = 0.007). The FNR of the multi-modal radiomics and clinical algorithm was 6.7% (10 of 150 with missed residual cancer). Surface/volume ratio at tomosynthesis and peritumoral entropy characteristics at ultrasound were the most relevant radiomics. Hormonal receptors and HER-2 status were the most important clinical predictors.

conclusionA multi-modal machine learning algorithm with pretreatment clinical, ultrasound, and tomosynthesis radiomics features may aid in predicting residual cancer after NAST. Pending prospective validation, this may facilitate individually tailored NAST regimens. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Multi-modal radiomics using pretreatment ultrasound and tomosynthesis showed significant improvement in assessing response to NAST compared to an algorithm using clinical variables only. Further prospective validation of our findings seems warranted to enable individualized predictions of NAST outcomes. KEY POINTS: • We proposed a multi-modal machine learning algorithm with pretreatment clinical, ultrasound, and tomosynthesis radiomics features to predict response to neoadjuvant breast cancer treatment. • Compared with the clinical algorithm, the AUC of this integrative algorithm is significantly higher. • Used prior to the initiative of therapy, our algorithm can identify patients who will experience pathologic complete response following neoadjuvant therapy with a high negative predictive value.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm, ResidualRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesBreast cancerMachine learningNeoadjuvant systemic treatmentTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID37707548
PMCPMC10957593
OpenAlexW4386725532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.