SynthesisJournal of Crohn's & colitis2024
Temporary Faecal Diversion for Refractory Perianal and/or Distal Colonic Crohn's Disease in the Biologic Era: An Updated Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of Crohn's & colitis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Second United Arab Emirates consensus guidance on the diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel disease.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- When nothing else matters: proctectomy for complex perianal Crohn's disease-indications, timing, techniques, and outcomes.Techniques in coloproctology · 2026Review
- 10 Strategies for prevention of perineal wound dehiscence after intersphincteric proctectomy for perianal Crohn's disease.Techniques in coloproctology · 2026Review
- Stoma formation and associated risk factors in patients with Crohn's disease in an Austrian tertiary referral hospital: a retrospective explorative study of long-term follow-up.Crohn's & colitis 360 · 2026Article
- The Impact of Fecal Diversion on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Adverse Gastrointestinal Toxicities.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- A Guide Through the Tunnel: Updates in the Approach to Classification and Management of Perianal Fistulizing Crohn's Disease.Current gastroenterology reports · 2025Review
- Intestinal Fibrosis in Crohn's Disease: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and New Therapeutic Targets.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Outcomes of intended temporary stomas in Crohn's disease (INTESTINE study): international, multicentre, retrospective study.BJS open · 2025Article
- Long-term outcomes of 'temporary' defunctioning in patients with severe perianal Crohn's disease.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025Article
- Perianal Crohn's disease: Still more questions than answers.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsWe evaluated short- and long-term outcomes of temporary faecal diversion [FD] for management of refractory Crohn's disease [CD], focusing on outcomes in the biologic era.
methodsThrough a systematic literature review until March 15, 2023, we identified 33 studies [19 conducted in the biologic era] that evaluated 1578 patients with perianal and/or distal colonic CD who underwent temporary FD [with intent of restoring bowel continuity] and reported long-term outcomes [primary outcome: successful restoration of bowel continuity, defined as remaining ostomy-free after reconnection at a minimum of 6 months after diversion or at the end of follow-up]. We calculated pooled rates (with 95% confidence interval [CI]) using random effects meta-analysis, and examined factors associated with successful restoration of bowel continuity.
resultsOverall, 61% patients [95% CI, 52-68%; 50% in biologic era] experienced clinical improvement after FD. Stoma takedown was attempted in 34% patients [28-41%; 37% in biologic era], 6-18 months after diversion. Among patients where bowel restoration was attempted, 63% patients [54-71%] had successful restoration of bowel continuity, and 26% [20-34%] required re-diversion. Overall, 21% patients [17-27%; 24% in biologic era] who underwent FD were successfully restored; 34% patients [30-39%; 31% in biologic era] required proctectomy with permanent ostomy. On meta-regression, post-diversion biologic use and absence of proctitis was associated with successful bowel restoration after temporary FD in contemporary studies.
conclusionIn the biologic era, temporary FD for refractory perianal and/or distal colonic CD improves symptoms in half the patients, and bowel continuity can be successfully restored in a quarter of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.