Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37707402›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer assisted tomography

Predicting Breast Cancer Subtypes Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Based Radiomics With Automatic Segmentation.

Wen-Yi Yue, Hong-Tao Zhang, Shen Gao, Guang Li, Ze-Yu Sun, Zhe Tang, Jian-Ming Cai, Ning Tian, Juan Zhou, Jing-Hui Dong and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer assisted tomography. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Wen-Yi Yue
Hong-Tao ZhangFrom the Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital.
Shen GaoFrom the Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital.
Guang LiKeya Medical Technology Co, Ltd, Beijing, China.
Ze-Yu SunKeya Medical Technology Co, Ltd, Beijing, China.
Zhe TangKeya Medical Technology Co, Ltd, Beijing, China.
Jian-Ming CaiFrom the Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital.
Ning TianFrom the Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital.
Juan ZhouFrom the Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital.
Jing-Hui DongFrom the Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital.
Yuan LiuFrom the Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital.
Xu BaiFrom the Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital.
Fu-Geng ShengFrom the Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of the study is to demonstrate whether radiomics based on an automatic segmentation method is feasible for predicting molecular subtypes.

methodsThis retrospective study included 516 patients with confirmed breast cancer. An automatic segmentation-3-dimensional UNet-based Convolutional Neural Networks, trained on our in-house data set-was applied to segment the regions of interest. A set of 1316 radiomics features per region of interest was extracted. Eighteen cross-combination radiomics methods-with 6 feature selection methods and 3 classifiers-were used for model selection. Model classification performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.

resultsThe average dice similarity coefficient value of the automatic segmentation was 0.89. The radiomics models were predictive of 4 molecular subtypes with the best average: AUC = 0.8623, accuracy = 0.6596, sensitivity = 0.6383, and specificity = 0.8775. For luminal versus nonluminal subtypes, AUC = 0.8788 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8505-0.9071), accuracy = 0.7756, sensitivity = 0.7973, and specificity = 0.7466. For human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-enriched versus non-HER2-enriched subtypes, AUC = 0.8676 (95% CI, 0.8370-0.8982), accuracy = 0.7737, sensitivity = 0.8859, and specificity = 0.7283. For triple-negative breast cancer versus non-triple-negative breast cancer subtypes, AUC = 0.9335 (95% CI, 0.9027-0.9643), accuracy = 0.9110, sensitivity = 0.4444, and specificity = 0.9865.

conclusionsRadiomics based on automatic segmentation of magnetic resonance imaging can predict breast cancer of 4 molecular subtypes noninvasively and is potentially applicable in large samples.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerRetrospective StudiesROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID37707402
PMCPMC10510832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.