Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37706637›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2023

Three ways of organising general practitioner's medical services in sheltered housing. A qualitative study.

Laila Tingvold, Line Melby

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 77% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laila TingvoldCentre for Care Research East, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0908-1743
Line MelbyCentre for Care Research East, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveExplore care providers' experiences with the organisation of the medical services for residents in round-the-clock staffed sheltered housing.

designQualitative study and thematic analysis of individual interviews after strategic sampling of participants.

settingRound-the-clock staffed sheltered housing in seven municipalities, inhabited by various user groups, and GPs in various locations in Norway. SUBJECTS: In-depth interviews with 18 participants: 11 managers or employees in sheltered housing and seven GPs.

main outcome measuresMain themes and subthemes reporting participants' experiences of medical provision to sheltered housing residents.

resultsThree main models of organizing medical services for round-the-clock staffed sheltered housing were identified: (i) the 'multiple GP' model, where each resident has their own individual GP; (ii) the 'single GP' model, where all residents in the sheltered housing have one common GP; (iii) the 'hybrid' model, where a few dedicated GPs follow up the residents.

conclusionResidents in round-the-clock staffed sheltered housing constitute a varied group that generally has substantial medical assistance needs. Given that many residents lack autonomy to manage their own care needs and make decisions, models with fewer GPs like models ii and iii seem to provide a better medical professional offer. Moving towards such an organising of the medical services for sheltered housing residents could have implications for GPs' workload and competence needs. Future studies are needed to test models and assess implications.

Indexed as

General PractitionersHousingHumansNorwayQualitative ResearchGeneral practitioner (GP)older patientsqualitative researchsheltered housing

Identifiers

PMID37706637
PMCPMC11001341
OpenAlexW4386725982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.