Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37706613›Full record

ArticleHippocampus2023

Extended trajectory of spatial memory errors in typical and atypical development: The role of binding and precision.

Maomiao Peng, Annalysa Lovos, Kenneth Bottrill, Katharine Hughes, Miranda Sampsel, Nancy Raitano Lee, Leonard Abbeduto, Angela John Thurman, Jamie Edgin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hippocampus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maomiao PengDepartment of Psychology, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Annalysa LovosDepartment of Psychology, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9709-8360
Kenneth BottrillDepartment of Psychology, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Katharine HughesDepartment of Psychology, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Miranda SampselDepartment of Psychology, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Nancy Raitano LeeDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Leonard AbbedutoMIND Institute, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, California, USA.
Angela John ThurmanMIND Institute, University of California Davis Health, Sacramento, California, USA.
Jamie EdginDepartment of Psychology, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.

Funding

Research Project: Pathologic Significance of Maternal AutoantibodiesP50HD103526 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI LEONARD J. ABBEDUTO, Melissa Dawn Bauman · 2020 to 2026
$9.7M
Memory Measures for Clinical Trials in Down syndrome and Fragile X syndromeR01HD088409 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI EDGIN, JAMIE O. · 2016 to 2020
$3.7M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103526NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD088409NIH HHS P50HD103526NIH HHS R01HD088409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial reconstruction, a method for evaluating how individuals remember the placement of objects, has traditionally been evaluated through the aggregate estimation of placement errors. However, this approach may obscure the nature of task errors. Specifically, recent data has suggested the importance of examining the precision of responses, as well as absolute performance on item-context bindings. In contrast to traditional analysis approaches based on the distance between the target and the reconstructed item, in this study we further explored three types of errors (swap error, global error, and local distance) that may all contribute to the distance, with particular emphasis on swap errors and local distance due to their associations with item-context bindings and memory precision, respectively. We examined these errors in children aged 3-18 years, making comparisons between children with typical development (TD) and children with Down syndrome (DS), a population with known memory challenges. As expected, older children outperformed younger children in terms of overall memory accuracy. Of importance is that we measured uneven maturational trajectories of memory abilities across the various error types. Specifically, both remembered locations (irrespective of object identity) and swap errors (object-location binding errors) align with the overall memory accuracy. Memory precision, as measured by local distance in simpler set size 2 trials, mirrored overall memory accuracy. However, for more complex set size 3 trials, local distance remained stable before age 8 and showed age-related change thereafter. The group with DS showed reduced precision compared to a TD matched group, and measures of precision, and to a lesser extent binding errors, correlated with standard neuropsychological outcomes. Overall, our study contributed to a fine-grained understanding of developing spatial memory ability in a large sample of typical developing children and a memory impaired population. These findings contribute to a growing body of research examining precision as a key factor in memory performance.

Indexed as

Mental RecallSpatial MemoryAdolescentChildCognitionHumansMemory, Short-TermNeuropsychological Testsdown syndromehippocampusmemory developmentprecisionrelational memory

Identifiers

PMID37706613
PMCPMC10638674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.