ArticleMedical physics2023
Deep learning-based dose prediction to improve the plan quality of volumetric modulated arc therapy for gynecologic cancers.
Article in Medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- An interactive virtual dosimetrist for adjusting radiotherapy dose quality.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- A comparative assessment of deep learning and knowledge-based dose prediction models for advanced radiotherapy planning of prostate cancer with focal boosting.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Reducing low-dose exposure in helical TomoTherapy for locally advanced left-sided breast cancer with a deformable image registration-based dose-mimicking workflow.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Intentional creation of suboptimal, realistic dose distributions.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Evaluation of deliverable artificial intelligence-based automated volumetric arc radiation therapy planning for whole pelvic radiation in gynecologic cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhancing stereotactic ablative boost radiotherapy dose prediction for bulky lung cancer: A multi-scale dilated network approach with scale-balanced structure loss.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Uninvolved liver dose prediction in stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver cancer based on the neural network method.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- Analyzing the Relationship between Dose and Geometric Agreement Metrics for Auto-Contouring in Head and Neck Normal Tissues.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Predicting voxel-level dose distributions of single-isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment plan for multiple brain metastases.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Deep learning-based dose prediction to improve the plan quality of volumetric modulated arc therapy for gynecologic cancers.Medical physics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn recent years, deep-learning models have been used to predict entire three-dimensional dose distributions. However, the usability of dose predictions to improve plan quality should be further investigated. PURPOSE: To develop a deep-learning model to predict high-quality dose distributions for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for patients with gynecologic cancer and to evaluate their usability in driving plan quality improvements.
methodsA total of 79 VMAT plans for the female pelvis were used to train (47 plans), validate (16 plans), and test (16 plans) 3D dense dilated U-Net models to predict 3D dose distributions. The models received the normalized CT scan, dose prescription, and target and normal tissue contours as inputs. Three models were used to predict the dose distributions for plans in the test set. A radiation oncologist specializing in the treatment of gynecologic cancers scored the test set predictions using a 5-point scale (5, acceptable as-is; 4, prefer minor edits; 3, minor edits needed; 2, major edits needed; and 1, unacceptable). The clinical plans for which the dose predictions indicated that improvements could be made were reoptimized with constraints extracted from the predictions.
resultsThe predicted dose distributions in the test set were of comparable quality to the clinical plans. The mean voxel-wise dose difference was -0.14 ± 0.46 Gy. The percentage dose differences in the predicted target metrics of
conclusionsDeep-learning dose prediction can be used to predict high-quality and clinically acceptable dose distributions for VMAT female pelvis plans, which can then be used to identify plans that can be improved with additional optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.