ArticleJournal of Crohn's & colitis2024
Validation of the IBD-Control Questionnaire across different sociodemographic and clinical subgroups: secondary analysis of a nationwide electronic survey.
Article in Journal of Crohn's & colitis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- The relationships between depression, inflammation and self-reported disease activity in IBD and their impact on healthcare usage.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Trial
- Evaluation of the Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version of IBDcQ-8 Questionnaire.Archives of Iranian medicine · 2026Article
- The UK vedolizumab real-life experience study in inflammatory bowel disease (VEST): patient characteristics, drug persistence and patient-centred outcomes.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Article
- Irritable Bowel Syndrome in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: An Evidence-Based Practical Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- A single-centre analysis of a biosimilar switching programme for adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Article
- Validation of the Portuguese Version of IBD-Control Questionnaire and Comparison with IBD-Disk.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Variation Between Hospitals in Outcomes and Costs of IBD Care: Results From the IBD Value Study.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2025Article
- Structural equation modeling of the impact of disease activity on inflammatory bowel disease control: the mediating roles of self-efficacy and self-management behaviors.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Real-world assessment of effectiveness and safety of filgotinib in 286 patients with ulcerative colitis in 9 UK centres.Drugs in context · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe IBD-Control Questionnaire is a simple, generic measure of patient-perceived disease control used increasingly in clinical practice and research. We aimed to address knowledge gaps in its psychometric performance, to ensure that it can be used with confidence in a variety of contexts.
methodsWe analysed 7341 responses to the IBD Registry COVID-19 survey, sent to 40 911 patients who completed an online self-assessment tool during the pandemic. Questions covered demographics, comorbidities, inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] sub-type, and IBD-Control Questionnaire and symptom scores [CD-PRO2 or UC-PRO2]. Psychometric properties of IBD-Control-8 were tested overall and within subgroups (Crohn's disease [CD], ulcerative colitis [UC] and IBD unclassified; male and female; ≤65 and >65 years; number of co-morbidities; deprivation status).
resultsInternal consistency was very strong overall [α: 0.84, ω: 0.89] and for each subgroup [α range: 0.81-0.85; ω: 0.86-0.90]. Construct validity was demonstrated by moderate correlation of each item with global rating [VAS] [rs range: 0.47-0.65], strong correlation between IBD-Control-8 score and VAS [rs = 0.74], moderate-to-strong with PRO2 scores [CD: rs = -0.718; UC: rs = -0.602] and significantly higher IBD-Control-8 scores for PRO2-remission vs PRO2-active, consistent across subgroups. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses demonstrated a two-factor model (items loading onto 'Health-related Quality of Life' [HRQoL] or 'Treatment' domains). Extensive tests for factorial invariance confirmed consistency.
conclusionsIBD-Control-8 is a psychometrically robust scale which can be used across a range of populations. It offers a quick, reliable, and valid method of assessing patient-perceived control. The construct of 'control' includes traditional HRQoL and a novel domain relating to treatment perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.