Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37706542›Full record

ArticleJournal of Crohn's & colitis2024

Validation of the IBD-Control Questionnaire across different sociodemographic and clinical subgroups: secondary analysis of a nationwide electronic survey.

Gerum G Gebeyehu, Frederick Taylor, Liz Dobson, J R Fraser Cummings, Stuart Bloom, Nicholas A Kennedy, Paul Christiansen, Keith Bodger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Crohn's & colitis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gerum G GebeyehuDepartment of Health Data Science, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Frederick TaylorDepartment of Health Data Science, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Liz DobsonIBD Registry Ltd, London, UK.
J R Fraser CummingsDepartment of Gastroenteroogy, University Hospitals Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9659-3247
Stuart BloomDepartment of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Nicholas A KennedyExeter Inflammatory Bowel Disease Research Group, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4368-1961
Paul ChristiansenDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Keith BodgerDepartment of Health Data Science, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1825-3239

Funding

IBD Registry Ltd
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe IBD-Control Questionnaire is a simple, generic measure of patient-perceived disease control used increasingly in clinical practice and research. We aimed to address knowledge gaps in its psychometric performance, to ensure that it can be used with confidence in a variety of contexts.

methodsWe analysed 7341 responses to the IBD Registry COVID-19 survey, sent to 40 911 patients who completed an online self-assessment tool during the pandemic. Questions covered demographics, comorbidities, inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] sub-type, and IBD-Control Questionnaire and symptom scores [CD-PRO2 or UC-PRO2]. Psychometric properties of IBD-Control-8 were tested overall and within subgroups (Crohn's disease [CD], ulcerative colitis [UC] and IBD unclassified; male and female; ≤65 and >65 years; number of co-morbidities; deprivation status).

resultsInternal consistency was very strong overall [α: 0.84, ω: 0.89] and for each subgroup [α range: 0.81-0.85; ω: 0.86-0.90]. Construct validity was demonstrated by moderate correlation of each item with global rating [VAS] [rs range: 0.47-0.65], strong correlation between IBD-Control-8 score and VAS [rs = 0.74], moderate-to-strong with PRO2 scores [CD: rs = -0.718; UC: rs = -0.602] and significantly higher IBD-Control-8 scores for PRO2-remission vs PRO2-active, consistent across subgroups. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses demonstrated a two-factor model (items loading onto 'Health-related Quality of Life' [HRQoL] or 'Treatment' domains). Extensive tests for factorial invariance confirmed consistency.

conclusionsIBD-Control-8 is a psychometrically robust scale which can be used across a range of populations. It offers a quick, reliable, and valid method of assessing patient-perceived control. The construct of 'control' includes traditional HRQoL and a novel domain relating to treatment perception.

Indexed as

Colitis, UlcerativeCrohn DiseaseInflammatory Bowel DiseasesFemaleHumansMaleQuality of LifeSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesInflammatory bowel diseasepatient-reported outcome measures

Identifiers

PMID37706542
PMCPMC10896631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.