ArticleCell transplantation
Haploidentical Natural Killer Cell Therapy as an Adjunct to Stem Cell Transplantation for Treatment of Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia.
Article in Cell transplantation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of the last two decades of NK cell-based clinical trials: state of the art of AML therapy.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluating the safety and feasibility of prophylactic third-party NK cell administration in high-risk AML patients post-HSCT.BMC cancer · 2025Trial
- Immunotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia: The antibodies, TriKEs, and CARs on the arduous road to cure.Blood reviews · 2026Review
- Allogeneic CD56 + cell infusion as a bridge to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia: a phase I clinical trial.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2026Article
- The innate defenders: a review of natural killer cell immunotherapies in cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Revolutionizing cancer treatment: the emerging potential and potential challenges ofTheranostics · 2024Review
- Immunopathogenic mechanisms and modulatory approaches to graft-versus-host disease prevention in acute myeloid leukaemia.Best practice & research. Clinical haematology · 2023Review
- Research Hotspots and Trends of NK Cell Immunotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Bibliometric Analysis From 2000 to 2023.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML), defined as failure of two cycles of induction therapy at diagnosis or of one cycle at relapse, represents a subgroup with poor outcomes. Haploidentical natural killer cell (NK) therapy is a strategy that is being explored in refractory malignancies. Historically, at our center, patients with refractory AML have been treated with cytoreductive therapy (fludarabine + cytosine + granulocyte colony-stimulating factor ± idarubicin or mitoxantrone + etoposide) followed by 1-week rest and then reduced-intensity transplant with fludarabine + melphalan. We used the same backbone for this trial (CTRI/2019/02/017505) with the addition of CD56-positive cells from a family donor infused 1 day after the completion of chemotherapy. CD56-positive selection was done using a CliniMACS Prodigy system (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) followed by overnight incubation in autologous plasma with 2 micromolar arsenic trioxide and 500 U/mL of interleukin-2. From February 2019, 14 patients with a median age of 29 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 16.5-38.5) were enrolled in this trial. Six were females. Six had primary refractory AML while eight had relapsed refractory AML. The median CD56-cell dose infused was 46.16 × 106/kg (IQR: 25.06-70.36). One patient withdrew consent after NK cell infusion. Of the 13 patients who proceeded to transplant, five died of immediate post-transplant complications while two did not engraft but were in morphologic leukemia-free state (both subsequently died of infective complications after the second transplant). Of the remaining six patients who engrafted and survived beyond 1 month of the transplant, two developed disease relapse and died. The remaining four patients are alive and relapse free at the last follow-up (mean follow-up duration of surviving patients is 24 months). The 2-year estimated overall survival for the cohort was 28.6% ± 12.1% while the treatment-related mortality (TRM) with this approach was 38.5% ± 13.5%. Haploidentical NK cell therapy as an adjunct to transplant is safe and needs further exploration in patients with AML. For refractory AML, post-transplant NK infusion and strategies to reduce TRM while using pre-transplant NK infusion merit exploration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.