ReviewJournal of minimal access surgery
Microwave ablation is superior to radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma below 5 cm - A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Journal of minimal access surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiofrequency ablation versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Review
- The impact of ultrasound contrast-enhanced fusion virtual navigation technology-guided microwave ablation (MWA) and standard MWA on the local tumor progression of hepatocellular carcinoma with unclear ultrasound images.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Development and management of iatrogenic biloma post microwave ablation of solitary metastatic breast cancer lesion in the liver.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
- Imaging-based prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after microwave ablation as bridge therapy: A glimpse into the future.World journal of transplantation · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to systematically evaluate the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) smaller than 5 cm using microwave ablation (MWA) versus radiofrequency ablation (RFA). PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase databases were searched for studies reporting comparisons of two interventions (MWA versus RFA) for patients with early-stage HCC published up to 31 December, 2022. The analysis evaluated the recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and complications. A total of 894 patients were enrolled in six studies (two randomised controlled trials and four propensity score cohort studies). There were 446 patients in the MWA group and 448 patients in the RFA group. Compared with RFA, MWA had a significant advantage in the post-operative 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year RFS (odds ratios [OR] = 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40, 0.84; OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.45, 0.80; OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.33, 0.93; and OR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.30, 0.65). The OS of MWA was significantly higher than that of RFA in 5 years after ablation (OR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.34, 0.68). Moreover, MWA had an advantage in the incidence of complications (OR = 2.23, 95% CI: 1.16, 4.29). In the comparison of percutaneous MWA and RFA in the treatment of HCC with a diameter smaller than 5 cm, MWA may have more advantages in improving the prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.