Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37706370›Full record

ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2023

Association of

Chingiz Asadov, Nigar Karimova, Aypara Hasanova, Bayram Bayramov, Aytan Shirinova, Zohra Alimirzoyeva

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. OncoTargets and therapy · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Chingiz AsadovDepartment of Haematopoesis Pathology, Institute of Haematology & Transfusiology, Genetic Resources Institute of Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences, Baku, Azerbaijan.
Nigar KarimovaDepartment of Biotechnology, Genetic Resources Institute of Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences, Baku, Azerbaijan.
Aypara HasanovaDepartment of Leukemogenesis Laboratory, Institute of Haematology & Transfusiology, Genetic Resources Institute of Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences, Baku, Azerbaijan.
Bayram BayramovDepartment of Human Genetics Laboratory, Genetic Resources Institute of Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences, Baku, Azerbaijan.
Aytan ShirinovaDepartment of Haematology, Institute of Haematology & Transfusiology, Genetic Resources Institute of Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences, Baku, Azerbaijan.
Zohra AlimirzoyevaDepartment of Haematology, Institute of Haematology & Transfusiology, Genetic Resources Institute of Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences, Baku, Azerbaijan.
Russian Research Institute of Hematology and Transfusiology · RUAzerbaijan National Academy of Sciences · AZAzerbaijan Scientific-Research & Design-Prospecting Power Engineering Institute · AZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & objectives: Imatinib mesylate (IM) is a reliable first line treatment for chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). Nevertheless, despite promising results, a considerable proportion of patients develop resistance to the drug. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes play a crucial role in IM metabolism. Thus, point mutations in CYP genes may modify IM enzyme activity resulting in insufficient treatment response. This investigation was aimed to identify the functional impact of CYP3A5*3, CYP3A4*18 and CYP2B6*6 polymorphisms on the IM response in patients with CML in Azerbaijan. Methods: Genotyping of CYP3A5*3, CYP3A4*18 and CYP2B6*6 was performed in 153 patients (102 IM non-responders and 51 IM responders) with CML by the PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) assays. The odds ratios (ORs) with 95 per cent confidence intervals (CIs) were applied to assess the association between allelic variants and IM therapy outcome. The results were validated by sequencing. Results: The frequency of the CYP3A4*18 allele was considerably lower in the responder's group (97.1 vs. 100%; P=0.036). For CYP3A5*3, the allelic frequency was slightly higher among the IM responders (100 vs. 99.02%) with no significant difference. Although patients heterozygous (TC) for CYP2B6*6 demonstrated a higher risk of acquiring resistance (OR 1.04; 95% CI: 0.492-2.218), differences were not significant (P=0.909). In addition, the homozygous genotype (TT) demonstrated a lower risk of unresponsiveness (OR 0.72; 95% CI: 0.283-1.836), but associations were not significant (P=0.491). Interpretation & conclusions: Our results demonstrated that CYP3A4*18 was significantly associated with IM treatment response in patients with CML in Azerbaijan, whereas rather common CYP3A5*3 was identified to have no such association.

Indexed as

Cytochrome P-450 CYP3ALeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveAzerbaijanCytochrome P-450 CYP2B6Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemGenotypeHumansImatinib MesylatePolymorphism, Single NucleotideTreatment OutcomeCYP2B6 protein, humanCYP3A4 protein, humanCYP3A5 protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP2B6Cytochrome P-450 CYP3ACytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemImatinib MesylateChronic myeloid leukaemiaCYP2B6CYP3A4CYP3A5drug responseimatinibPCRRFLP

Identifiers

PMID37706370
PMCPMC10645035
OpenAlexW4386686697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.