ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2023
Relief of post-stroke spasticity with acute vibrotactile stimulation: controlled crossover study of muscle and skin stimulus methods.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03814889 (Passive Tactile Stimulation for Stroke Rehabilitation), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Passive Tactile Stimulation for Stroke Rehabilitation
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Vibrotactile stimulation for upper-limb neurorehabilitation and sensorimotor training: a systematic review of clinical and mechanistic evidence.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Pooled it
- Editorial: Nanomaterial design and engineering for enhanced physical therapy modalities.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- The Effects of Whole-Body Vibration on Spasticity in Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Optimizing Cross-Modal Matching for Multimodal Motor Rehabilitation.IEEE ... International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics : [proceedings] · 2025Article
- A review about muscle focal vibration contribution on spasticity recovery.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prior work suggests that vibratory stimulation can reduce spasticity and hypertonia. It is unknown which of three predominant approaches (stimulation of the spastic muscle, antagonist muscle, or cutaneous regions) most reduces these symptoms. Objective: Determine which vibrotactile stimulation approach is most effective at reducing spastic hypertonia among post-stroke patients. Methods: Sham-controlled crossover study with random assignment of condition order in fourteen patients with post-stroke hand spasticity. All patients were studied in four conditions over four visits: three stimulation conditions and a sham control. The primary outcome measure was the Modified Ashworth Scale, and the secondary outcome measure was the Modified Tardieu Scale measured manually and using 3D motion capture. For each condition, measures of spastic hypertonia were taken at four time points: baseline, during stimulation, after stimulation was removed, and after a gripping exercise. Results: A clinically meaningful difference in spastic hypertonia was found during and after cutaneous stimulation of the hand. Modified Ashworth and Modified Tardieu scores were reduced by a median of 1.1 (SD = 0.84, Conclusions: Cutaneous vibrotactile stimulation of the hand provides significant reductions in spastic hypertonia, compared to muscle stimulation. Clinical trial registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03814889.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.