Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37706171›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2023

Relief of post-stroke spasticity with acute vibrotactile stimulation: controlled crossover study of muscle and skin stimulus methods.

Caitlyn Seim, Bingxian Chen, Chuzhang Han, David Vacek, Laura Song Wu, Maarten Lansberg, Allison Okamura

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03814889 (Passive Tactile Stimulation for Stroke Rehabilitation), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03814889 nacompletednot on this map

Passive Tactile Stimulation for Stroke Rehabilitation

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2019 to 2022Enrolled35ConditionsStroke, Stroke, Ischemic, Stroke Hemorrhagic, Spasticity as Sequela of StrokeArmsVibration pattern, No vibration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Optimizing Cross-Modal Matching for Multimodal Motor Rehabilitation.IEEE ... International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics : [proceedings] · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Caitlyn SeimStanford University Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford, CA, United States.
Bingxian ChenStanford University Department of Bioengineering, Stanford, CA, United States.
Chuzhang HanStanford University Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford, CA, United States.
David VacekStanford University Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford, CA, United States.
Laura Song WuStanford University Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford, CA, United States.
Maarten LansbergStanford University Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford, CA, United States.
Allison OkamuraStanford University Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prior work suggests that vibratory stimulation can reduce spasticity and hypertonia. It is unknown which of three predominant approaches (stimulation of the spastic muscle, antagonist muscle, or cutaneous regions) most reduces these symptoms. Objective: Determine which vibrotactile stimulation approach is most effective at reducing spastic hypertonia among post-stroke patients. Methods: Sham-controlled crossover study with random assignment of condition order in fourteen patients with post-stroke hand spasticity. All patients were studied in four conditions over four visits: three stimulation conditions and a sham control. The primary outcome measure was the Modified Ashworth Scale, and the secondary outcome measure was the Modified Tardieu Scale measured manually and using 3D motion capture. For each condition, measures of spastic hypertonia were taken at four time points: baseline, during stimulation, after stimulation was removed, and after a gripping exercise. Results: A clinically meaningful difference in spastic hypertonia was found during and after cutaneous stimulation of the hand. Modified Ashworth and Modified Tardieu scores were reduced by a median of 1.1 (SD = 0.84, Conclusions: Cutaneous vibrotactile stimulation of the hand provides significant reductions in spastic hypertonia, compared to muscle stimulation. Clinical trial registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03814889.

Indexed as

muscle spasticitystimulationstrokestroke rehabilitationvibration

Identifiers

PMID37706171
PMCPMC10497102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.