Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37706138›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

The Impact of Continuity of Care on Health Indicators in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Family Medicine Clinics in Riyadh.

Ghada Hussein, Aljoharah A Al Saud, Ahmad M Siddiqi, Abdallah Khasawinah, Ahmad Alenezi, Riham A Mohammed, Yaser A Alendijani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ghada HusseinFamily Medicine and Polyclinics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, SAU.
Aljoharah A Al SaudFamily Medicine and Polyclinics, Alfaisal University College of Medicine, Riyadh, SAU.
Ahmad M SiddiqiFamily Medicine and Polyclinics, Alfaisal University College of Medicine, Riyadh, SAU.
Abdallah KhasawinahFamily Medicine and Polyclinics, Alfaisal University College of Medicine, Riyadh, SAU.
Ahmad AleneziFamily Medicine and Polyclinics, Alfaisal University College of Medicine, Riyadh, SAU.
Riham A MohammedFamily Medicine and Polyclinics, Alfaisal University College of Medicine, Riyadh, SAU.
Yaser A AlendijaniFamily Medicine and Polyclinics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes Mellitus Type 2 (DM2) is highly prevalent in Saudi Arabia, with many experiencing complications due to the disease. Family medicine physicians are usually the primary care providers responsible for the medical management of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Microvascular and macrovascular complications can occur if type 2 diabetes mellitus is poorly managed. Effective management of health indicators in patients with DM2 relating to glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), low density lipoprotein cholesterol, blood pressure, and tobacco use is an essential part of medical care to prevent complications. Due to the projected increase in the number of patients with DM2, there is huge concern surrounding the management of this chronic illness that requires review. This study aims to evaluate the impact of continuity of care on health indicators among family medicine patients diagnosed with diabetes mellitus type 2 and to analyze the effect of continuity of care regarding the completion of age-appropriate preventive health screenings.

methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study. Data collected from electronic medical records of patients 40-75 years of age that received care at the Family Medicine clinics that were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus with ≥4 clinic visits from January 1, 2017, to June 30, 2020, at King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Data collected included demographic data, body mass index, smoking status, blood pressure, past medical history, preventive health screening completed, and laboratory results, including HbA1c and lipid profile. The continuity of care index and usual provider continuity score indices were calculated for the analysis to measure continuity of care.

resultsThree hundred and fifty-two patients were included in the study. Most of the patients were Saudi (74.15%), female (51.99%), and married (82.67%). In addition, 90.34% accounted for a high usual provider continuity of care score (UPCS), and 64.20% of the patients had a high continuity of care index (COCi). Younger age groups were significantly more prevalent in the high UPCS group (p=0.037). Additionally, patients of non-Saudi nationalities constituted a significantly larger proportion of the high UPCS group. Single patients showed high UPCS. Comorbidities were not different between the groups, except inflammatory joint disease, which was more common in the low COCi group. Preventative screening measures were also not different between the groups; however, the type of colon cancer screening differed, where patients with high COCi more frequently underwent colonoscopies (13.3% vs. 4.4%, p=0.015) instead of fecal occult blood tests.

conclusionFor the first time, we report the implications of the continuity of care for DM2 patients in Saudi Arabia and the Middle East. Continuity of care did not result in the improvement of health indicators or in the completion of preventive health screenings in diabetic patients. Further studies are needed in the region to confirm our findings and assess the association between continuity of care and patient health indicators impact.

Indexed as

continuity of carecontinuity of care indexdiabetesfamily medicinehealth indicatorsusual provider continuity score

Identifiers

PMID37706138
PMCPMC10496726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.