ArticleCureus2023
Impact of Virtual Reality on Pharmacology Education: A Pilot Study.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Student Perceptions of a Virtual Reality Animation for Teaching Absorption and Bioavailability in Pharmacology: A Mixed Methods Evaluation.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2026Article
- Reimagining pharmacology education.Pharmacological reviews · 2026Review
- Evaluation of the Metaverse for Teaching and Learning Pharmacology: A Mixed-Method Study.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
- Relationship Between Virtual Pharmacology Lecture, Attendance and Performance: Personal Experience With Veterinary Students of the University of BUEA, Southwest Cameroon.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2025Article
- Knowledge, counseling practices, and educational gaps related to drug-food interactions among healthcare professionals in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Virtual reality (VR) is a powerful tool in health professional education. It has been successfully implemented in various domains of education with positive learning outcomes. The three-dimensional (3D) visualization offered by VR can potentially be applied to learn complex pharmacology topics. This study aims to investigate whether VR technology can improve the learning of complex pharmacological concepts. Methods A VR learning module on cardiovascular drugs was developed using Kern's six-step framework. 32 medical students participated in the pilot study. Their pharmacology knowledge was assessed using pre- and post-intervention tests. Additionally, feedback from the participants were collected through a post-intervention survey that assessed learner satisfaction, ease of use, perceived usefulness, quality of visual elements, intention to use, and comfort level during the VR experience. Results Participants scored significantly higher in the post-intervention test than in the pre-intervention test (p <0.05). A majority of the participants (90%) were satisfied with the VR module, finding it easy to use, and time efficient. A minority of participants (15%) preferred a traditional learning format while some participants (20%) experienced discomfort in VR. Conclusion Our findings suggest that VR enhances pharmacology knowledge in medical students and is well-received as an innovative educational tool. By providing immersive 3D visualization of complex drug actions, VR has the potential to transform pharmacology education into an engaging and effective learning experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.