Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37706130›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Radiological and Functional Outcomes and Associated Factors After Secondary Intramedullary Nailing Among Patients With Open Fractures of the Lower Limb.

Maneesh K Maurya, Tarun Solanki, Vivekanand Pal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maneesh K MauryaOrthopaedics, KVR Hospital Kashipur, Kashipur, IND.
Tarun SolankiOrthopaedics, KVR Hospital Kashipur, Kashipur, IND.
Vivekanand PalOrthopaedics, KVR Hospital Kashipur, Kashipur, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Open fractures of the lower limb are serious injuries caused by high-energy trauma that can lead to long-term disability. Initial treatment includes wound debridement, fracture reduction, and external fixation to stabilize bone fragments. Secondary nailing, a surgical technique to provide additional stability, has been shown to promote early mobilization and improve fracture alignment. However, there is a lack of consensus on the optimal timing and technique for secondary nailing. This study aims to evaluate the functional and radiological outcomes of patients who undergo secondary nailing for open fractures of the lower limb. Methods The study was a hospital-based prospective study of 53 patients who underwent secondary nailing for open fractures of the lower limbs. Patients aged 18 years or older, with Gustilo-Anderson classification grades 1, 2, or 3 A and B, who underwent wound debridement and external fixator application, followed by conversion to secondary intramedullary nail fixation between January 2019 and December 2021 were included in the study. The primary outcome measures were functional and radiological outcomes at follow-ups, assessed using the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) and Radiographic Union Scale for Tibia fractures (RUST) score. Data were collected prospectively and analyzed using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0, Armonk, NY). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient demographics and injury characteristics, and the Student's t-test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to compare continuous variables between groups. The study had a final analysis of 39 patients. Results The study reports the baseline characteristics, radiological, and functional outcomes of 39 patients who underwent secondary nailing for open fractures of the lower limb. The majority of the fractures occurred in the tibia (71.8%), with most classified as grade 3 (A and B) (69.2%). At the end of the six-month period after secondary nailing, 74.4% of the fractures had a union. Radiological and functional outcomes showed significant improvement after undergoing secondary nailing. Gender and age group did not have a significant association with the radiological outcome, while the time interval between external fixation and secondary nailing was significantly associated with the radiological outcome at six weeks and three months. Conclusion According to a study, secondary nailing is effective in managing lower limb open fractures with good radiological and functional outcomes. The time interval between external fixation and secondary nailing affects radiological outcomes, with longer delays leading to lower RUST scores. Orthopaedic surgeons should consider this factor when planning surgical management. Larger sample sizes and more extended follow-up periods are needed to confirm findings and evaluate the effect of other variables on the outcome.

Indexed as

external fixatorfemurfractureintramedullary nailingtibia

Identifiers

PMID37706130
PMCPMC10496937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.