Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37706067›Full record

ArticleACS applied nano materials2023

Using Machine Learning and Silver Nanoparticle-Based Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy for Classification of Cardiovascular Disease Biomarkers.

Katelyn Dixon, Raissa Bonon, Felix Ivander, Saba Ale Ebrahim, Khashayar Namdar, Moein Shayegannia, Farzad Khalvati, Nazir P Kherani, Anna Zavodni, Naomi Matsuura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS applied nano materials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Metal-Based Nanoparticles for Cardiovascular Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Katelyn DixonDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto M5S 1A4, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6902-7578
Raissa BononInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto M5S 3E2, Canada.
Felix IvanderInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto M5S 3E2, Canada.
Saba Ale EbrahimDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto M5S 1A4, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4051-7886
Khashayar NamdarInstitute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto M5S 1A8, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0497-6206
Moein ShayeganniaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto M5S 1A4, Canada.
Farzad KhalvatiInstitute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto M5S 1A8, Canada.
Nazir P KheraniDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto M5S 1A4, Canada.
Anna ZavodniDepartment of Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto M5T 1W7, Canada.
Naomi MatsuuraInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto M5S 3E2, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Characterizing complex biofluids using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) coupled with machine learning (ML) has been proposed as a powerful tool for point-of-care detection of clinical disease. ML is well-suited to categorizing otherwise uninterpretable, patient-derived SERS spectra that contain a multitude of low concentration, disease-specific molecular biomarkers among a dense spectral background of biological molecules. However, ML can generate false, non-generalizable models when data sets used for model training are inadequate. It is thus critical to determine how different SERS experimental methodologies and workflow parameters can potentially impact ML disease classification of clinical samples. In this study, a label-free, broadband, Ag nanoparticle-based SERS platform was coupled with ML to assess simulated clinical samples for cardiovascular disease (CVD), containing randomized combinations of five key CVD biomarkers at clinically relevant concentrations in serum. Raman spectra obtained at 532, 633, and 785 nm from up to 300 unique samples were classified into physiological and pathological categories using two standard ML models. Label-free SERS and ML could correctly classify randomized CVD samples with high accuracies of up to 90.0% at 532 nm using as few as 200 training samples. Spectra obtained at 532 nm produced the highest accuracies with no significant increase achieved using multiwavelength SERS. Sample preparation and measurement methodologies (e.g., different SERS substrate lots, sample volumes, sample sizes, and known variations in randomization and experimental handling) were shown to strongly influence the ML classification and could artificially increase classification accuracies by as much as 27%. This detailed investigation into the proper application of ML techniques for CVD classification can lead to improved data set acquisition required for the SERS community, such that ML on labeled and robust SERS data sets can be practically applied for future point-of-care testing in patients.

Identifiers

PMID37706067
PMCPMC10496841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.