Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37705851›Full record

ArticlePsychology research and behavior management2023

Why Cannot I Stop Phubbing? Boredom Proneness and Phubbing: A Multiple Mediation Model.

Bin Gao, Yuanyuan Liu, Quanwei Shen, Changqing Fu, Weiyi Li, Xu Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology research and behavior management, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bin Gao *Research Institute for International and Comparative Education, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-0248-6492
Yuanyuan Liu *Mental Health Center, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, 442000, People's Republic of China.
Quanwei ShenSchool of Education, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-3709-0295
Changqing FuMental Health Center, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, 442000, People's Republic of China.
Weiyi LiSchool of Business Administration, Jimei University, Xiamen, 361021, People's Republic of China.
Xu LiSchool of Education, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: With the popularity of smartphone and their increasingly rich functions, people's attachment to their phones is increasing. While people enjoy the convenience that smartphone bring (eg, accessing information and socializing), it also leads to problematic smartphone use (eg, phubbing). Previous research has shown that boredom proneness can trigger phubbing. However, the underlying psychological mechanisms are not yet clear. Methods: To address this research gap, we surveyed 556 Chinese college students ( Results: (1) Boredom proneness could positively predict phubbing; (2) loneliness and FoMO mediated the relationship between boredom proneness and phubbing, respectively; and (3) loneliness and FoMO sequentially mediated the relationship between boredom proneness and phubbing. Conclusion: These findings are not only valuable for understanding the underlying mechanisms linking boredom proneness and phubbing, but also suggest that three types of interventions could be effectively used to decrease the risk of phubbing among college students, namely, reducing boredom proneness, relieving loneliness, and decreasing FoMO.

Indexed as

boredom pronenesscollege studentsFoMOlonelinessmultiple mediation modelphubbing

Identifiers

PMID37705851
PMCPMC10497055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.