ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2023
Identification of experimentally-supported poly(A) sites in single-cell RNA-seq data with SCINPAS.
Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A hybrid transcriptome assembly reveals coding and noncoding landscapes in Drosophila hemocytes.Genetics · 2026Article
- miRNA regulation in brain tissue space: the 3'UTR perspective.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Review
- metaAPA: a tool for integration of PolyA site predictions from single-cell and spatial transcriptomics.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alternative polyadenylation is a main driver of transcriptome diversity in mammals, generating transcript isoforms with different 3' ends via cleavage and polyadenylation at distinct polyadenylation (poly(A)) sites. The regulation of cell type-specific poly(A) site choice is not completely resolved, and requires quantitative poly(A) site usage data across cell types. 3' end-based single-cell RNA-seq can now be broadly used to obtain such data, enabling the identification and quantification of poly(A) sites with direct experimental support. We propose SCINPAS, a computational method to identify poly(A) sites from scRNA-seq datasets. SCINPAS modifies the read deduplication step to favor the selection of distal reads and extract those with non-templated poly(A) tails. This approach improves the resolution of poly(A) site recovery relative to standard software. SCINPAS identifies poly(A) sites in genic and non-genic regions, providing complementary information relative to other tools. The workflow is modular, and the key read deduplication step is general, enabling the use of SCINPAS in other typical analyses of single cell gene expression. Taken together, we show that SCINPAS is able to identify experimentally-supported, known and novel poly(A) sites from 3' end-based single-cell RNA sequencing data.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.