Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37705685›Full record

ArticleBMJ medicine2023

Preconception contraceptive use and miscarriage: prospective cohort study.

Jennifer J Yland, Amelia K Wesselink, Sonia Hernandez-Diaz, Krista Huybrechts, Elizabeth E Hatch, Tanran R Wang, David Savitz, Wendy Kuohung, Kenneth J Rothman, Lauren A Wise

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jennifer J YlandDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7870-8971
Amelia K WesselinkDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3929-4451
Sonia Hernandez-DiazDepartment of Epidemiology and CAUSALab, Harvard University T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Krista HuybrechtsDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Elizabeth E HatchDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Tanran R WangDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
David SavitzDepartment of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
Wendy KuohungDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Kenneth J RothmanDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Lauren A WiseDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

An internet-based preconception cohort study in North America and DenmarkR01HD086742 · NICHD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI LAUREN A WISE · 2016 to 2026
$6.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD086742
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the association between preconception contraceptive use and miscarriage. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Residents of the United States of America or Canada, recruited from 2013 until the end of 2022. Participants: 13 460 female identified participants aged 21-45 years who were planning a pregnancy were included, of whom 8899 conceived. Participants reported data for contraceptive history, early pregnancy, miscarriage, and potential confounders during preconception and pregnancy. Main outcome measure: Miscarriage, defined as pregnancy loss before 20 weeks of gestation. Results: Preconception use of combined and progestin-only oral contraceptives, hormonal intrauterine devices, copper intrauterine devices, rings, implants, or natural methods was not associated with miscarriage compared with use of barrier methods. Participants who most recently used patch (incidence rate ratios 1.34 (95% confidence interval 0.81 to 2.21)) or injectable contraceptives (1.44 (0.99 to 2.12)) had higher rates of miscarriage compared with recent users of barrier methods, although results were imprecise due to the small numbers of participants who used patch and injectable contraceptives. Conclusions: Use of most contraceptives before conception was not appreciably associated with miscarriage rate. Individuals who used patch and injectable contraceptives had higher rates of miscarriage relative to users of barrier methods, although these results were imprecise and residual confounding was possible.

Indexed as

EpidemiologyPregnancy complicationsReproductive medicine

Identifiers

PMID37705685
PMCPMC10496668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.