ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2023
Deep learning-based automatic action extraction from structured chemical synthesis procedures.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article proposes a methodology that uses machine learning algorithms to extract actions from structured chemical synthesis procedures, thereby bridging the gap between chemistry and natural language processing. The proposed pipeline combines ML algorithms and scripts to extract relevant data from USPTO and EPO patents, which helps transform experimental procedures into structured actions. This pipeline includes two primary tasks: classifying patent paragraphs to select chemical procedures and converting chemical procedure sentences into a structured, simplified format. We employ artificial neural networks such as long short-term memory, bidirectional LSTMs, transformers, and fine-tuned T5. Our results show that the bidirectional LSTM classifier achieved the highest accuracy of 0.939 in the first task, while the Transformer model attained the highest BLEU score of 0.951 in the second task. The developed pipeline enables the creation of a dataset of chemical reactions and their procedures in a structured format, facilitating the application of AI-based approaches to streamline synthetic pathways, predict reaction outcomes, and optimize experimental conditions. Furthermore, the developed pipeline allows for creating a structured dataset of chemical reactions and procedures, making it easier for researchers to access and utilize the valuable information in synthesis procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.