ArticlePractical laboratory medicine2023
Evaluation of the Abbott Alinity m STI assay for diagnosis of the primary causes of sexually transmitted infections in the United States.
Article in Practical laboratory medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Guidelines and Diagnostic Assays forOpen forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Article
- Diagnostic-avoiding Chlamydia trachomatis variants detected in cervical and endometrial specimens from women during 16S microbiome profiling.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- The Past, Present, and Future in the Diagnosis of a Neglected Sexually Transmitted Infection: Trichomoniasis.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The sexually transmitted infections, Design and methods: Urine and genital swabs from 142 patient samples were tested from an adult outpatient population in the Northeast United States. The positive and negative percent agreement for CT, NG, and TV were determined by comparison with the Hologic Panther Aptima assay. The analytical sensitivity was determined through serial dilution of standards for CT, NG, TV, and MG in negative urine and swab matrix. Results: The positive and negative percent agreement of the Alinity m assay in comparison with the Hologic Panther Aptima assay were, respectively: CT [100.0% (90.6-100.0%) and 99.1% (94.8-100.0%)], NG [100.0% (89.6-100.0%) and 99.1% (94.9-100.0%)]; and TV [96.3% (81.7-99.8%) and 99.1% (95.2-100.0%)]. The limits of detection in urine and swab matrix were, respectively: CT ≤ 5, ≤1; NG ≤ 5, ≤5; TV ≤ 0.5, ≤0.5; and MG ≤ 500, ≤250 genome copies/mL. Conclusions: The Alinity m assay demonstrated excellent performance characteristics and identifies CT, NG, and TV accurately compared with a well-established comparator.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.