ArticlePractical laboratory medicine2023
Comparison of the clinical performance of the Atyp.C parameter of the UF-5000 fully automated urine particle analyzer with that of microscopic urine sediment analysis.
Article in Practical laboratory medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- UF-5000 Atyp.C parameter for urinary screening: Impact of detecting atypical and inclusion-bearing cells.Practical laboratory medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Evaluation of the fully automated urine particle analyzer UF-1500.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2023Article
- Comparison of Automated Urinalysis Parameter Atyp.C and Urine Cytology for Detecting Bladder CarcinomaCancer diagnosis & prognosisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
a Objectives: Urinalysis is one of the most common laboratory screening tests to detect problems in the renal and urinary system; however, they cannot detect atypical cells (Atyp.Cs). The Sysmex UF-5000, a fully automated urine particle analyzer, can detect Atyp.Cs via its Atyp.C parameter. This study aimed to compare the clinical value of the Atyp.C parameter with that of urine sediment microscopy. b Method: A total of 471 leftover urine samples were submitted to the Department of Clinical Laboratory at the University of Tokyo Hospital for urinalysis by manual sediment microscopy examination and UF-5000 Atyp.C analysis. c Result: Of 471 submitted samples, 117 were positive for Atyp.Cs by urine sediment and 354 samples were negative. The histological subtypes of the Atyp.Cs included 105 cases of suspected urothelial carcinoma cells, 10 suspected squamous carcinoma cells, and 2 of suspected adenocarcinoma cells. The Atyp.C values for the Atyp.C-positive and -negative groups were 2.64 ± 0.69 and 0.38 ± 0.16, respectively. The optimal Atyp.C cutoff value determined by the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was 0.4/μL. The area under the curve was 0.856, with a sensitivity of 79.5% and specificity of 85.1%. Atyp.C values of the UF-5000 showed high predictive performance for Atyp.C-positive specimens identified by urine sediment microscopy. d Conclusions: This study shows that a combination of UF-5000 analysis and microscopic examination of urine sediment improves Atyp.C detection in urine sediment analysis. These results suggest that Atyp.C measured by UF-5000 could be a useful screening parameter in routine testing of urine samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.