ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics
Effect of immediate dentin sealing on the fracture strength of indirect overlay restorations using different types of luting agents (A comparative
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Effect of Immediate Dentin Sealing on the Marginal Adaptation and Microleakage of Indirect Restorations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International dental journal · 2026Pooled it
- Fracture resistance of posterior teeth restored by lithium silicate-based and hybrid ceramic partial coverage restorations with different preparation designs: a scoping review.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Preheated Composite for Prosthetic Cementation to Enamel and Dentin: A Scoping Review.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Er:YAG Laser Versus Sandblasting for Build-Up Conditioning in Adhesive Cementation: A Retrospective Study of 187 Posterior Indirect Restorations.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Influences of different fiber-reinforced biobases on the fracture strength and failure mode of lithium disilicate overlay restorations (a comparativeJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2025Article
- Influence of Immediate Dentin Sealing on Bond Strength of Resin-Based CAD/CAM Restoratives to Dentin: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Effect of immediate dentin sealing on the fracture strength of indirect posterior restorations:Systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.F1000Research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study evaluates the effects of immediate dentin sealing (IDS) on the fracture resistance of lithium disilicate overlays using three different types of resin-luting agents (preheated composite, dual-cure adhesive resin, and flowable composite). Materials and Methods: Forty-eight maxillary first premolars of equal size were prepared using a butt joint preparation design. The teeth were separated into two primary groups, each with 24 teeth: Group DDS - delay dentin sealing (DDS) (non-IDS) teeth were not treated. Group IDS - dentin sealing was applied immediately after teeth preparations. Each group was subsequently separated into three separate subgroups of eight teeth. Subgroups DDS+Phc and IDS+Phc - cemented with preheated composite (Enamel plus HRi, Micerium, Italy), subgroups DDS+Dcrs and IDS+Dcrs - cemented with dual-cured resin cement (RelyX Ultimate, 3M ESPE, Germany), and subgroups DDS+Fc and IDS+Fc - cemented with flowable composite (Filtek Supreme Flowable, 3M ESPE, USA). The fracture resistance of each sample was evaluated using a test of a single load till failure, which was automatically recorded in Newton by a computer-controlled universal testing system. Results: The fracture resistance of the subgroup IDS+Phc was the highest mean value, in which the overlay was cemented with preheated composite (1954 N), and the lowest mean was noted in the subgroup DDS+Fc, by which the overlay cemented with flowable composite without IDS (887 N). All IDS subgroups had a high mean fracture load. Both the Bonferroni test and the one-way ANOVA test identified a significant difference between all groups of 0.05. Conclusion: In general, teeth with IDS were stronger than teeth without IDS. When the preheated composite is used as a luting agent improves overall fracture resistance, followed by resin cement and flowable composite, respectively. However, the result showed that the ceramic overlays with and without IDS are strong enough to withstand the normal mastication force. Overlays was failed in a more catastrophic, irreparable mode of fracture than the clinical situation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.