ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics
Comparative evaluation of pericervical dentin preservation and fracture resistance of root canal-treated teeth with rotary endodontic file systems of different types of taper - An
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combined Effects of Instrumentation Geometry and Sealer Type on Mandibular Premolar Root Fracture Resistance.Cureus · 2026Article
- Micro-CT Evaluation of Dentin Preservation by ProTaper Gold and VDW.Rotate in Oval Mandibular Incisors.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2026Article
- Exploration of uninstrumented areas and volumetric precision of ProTaper Ultimate versus ProTaper Next file systems: A micro-computed tomography study.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Micro-Computed Tomography Analysis of Reciprocating Systems in Three-Dimensional Models of Mandibular Premolars with Two Canals.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of pericervical dentin reduction using three rotary file systems: A micro-computed tomography study.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Comparison of peri-cervical dentin on conservative and conventional access cavity designs with waveone gold and hyflex electrical discharge machining instrumentation using cone-beam computed tomography - AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Evaluation of fracture resistance among endodontically treated teeth using constant, variable and guiding taper endodontic file systems.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Comparative evaluation of reinforcing effect of three different intra-orifice barriers on pericervical dentin of endodontically treated teeth: AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the pericervical dentin preservation and fracture resistance of root canal-treated teeth with rotary endodontic file systems of different types of taper. Subjects and Methods: Thirty-two single-rooted human-extracted premolars were used. They were mounted in wax, and preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were taken with 11 × 8 Field of view (FOV). The evaluation of the pericervical dentin thickness was done at the cementoenamel junction level. After pre-CBCT, the 32 samples were divided into four groups ( Statistical Analysis Used: Student's Results: The results of this study showed that there is no statistically significant difference in preserving pericervical dentin with file system of different types of taper and fracture resistance between the groups. Conclusions: Within the limitations of the study, it was concluded that different types of file taper systems used for root canal preparation have no significant effect on the preservation of pericervical dentin and fracture resistance of teeth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.