ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2024
Time-efficient, high-resolution 3T whole-brain relaxometry using 3D-QALAS with wave-CAIPI readouts.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Group-Patch Joint Compression: Compressing Dynamic BMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Technical Development and Implementation of 3D-QALAS on a 1.5T MR-Linac for the Brain: A Prospective R-IDEAL Stage 0/1 Technology Development Report.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Impact of the Magnetization Transfer Effect on T1 Measurements in Quantitative MR Imaging: Comparison of the Two-dimensional Multidynamic Multiecho (2D-MDME) and Three-dimensional Quantification Using an Interleaved Look-Locker Acquisition Sequence (3D-QALAS) Protocols on Two Systems.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025Article
- Vendor-agnostic 3D multiparametric relaxometry improves cross-platform reproducibility.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Time-efficient, high-resolution 3T whole-brain relaxometry using Cartesian 3D MR Spin TomogrAphy in Time-Domain (MR-STAT) with cerebrospinal fluid suppression.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Comparison of test-retest repeatability of DESPOT and 3D-QALAS for TQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- A Water Relaxation Atlas for Age- and Region-Specific Metabolite Concentration Correction at 3 T.NMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
- Quantitative TImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Mesoscale Brain Mapping: Bridging Scales and Modalities in Neuroimaging - A Symposium Review.Neuroinformatics · 2024Review
- Zero-DeepSub: Zero-shot deep subspace reconstruction for rapid multiparametric quantitative MRI using 3D-QALAS.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2024Article
- SSL-QALAS: Self-Supervised Learning for rapid multiparameter estimation in quantitative MRI using 3D-QALAS.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeVolumetric, high-resolution, quantitative mapping of brain-tissue relaxation properties is hindered by long acquisition times and SNR challenges. This study combines time-efficient wave-controlled aliasing in parallel imaging (wave-CAIPI) readouts with the 3D quantification using an interleaved Look-Locker acquisition sequence with a T
methodsWave-CAIPI readouts were embedded in the standard 3D-QALAS encoding scheme, enabling full-brain quantitative parameter maps (T
resultsWhen tested in both the ISMRM/NIST phantom and 10 healthy volunteers, the quantitative maps using the accelerated protocol showed excellent agreement against those obtained from conventional 3D-QALAS at R
conclusionThree-dimensional QALAS enhanced with wave-CAIPI readouts enables time-efficient, full-brain quantitative T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.