Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37705308›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2024

Challenges and recommendations for advancing respite care for families of children and youth with special health care needs: A qualitative exploration.

Roberta L Woodgate, Corinne A Isaak, Ardelle Kipling, Sue Kirk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Challenges and recommendations for advancing respite care for families of children and youth with special health care needs: A qualitative exploration.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Roberta L WoodgateCollege of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7176-2390
Corinne A IsaakCollege of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7787-3411
Ardelle KiplingCollege of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Sue KirkSchool of Nursing, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1485-8804

Funding

CIHR Canadian Institutes of Health ResearchCIHR CIHR -Canadian Research Chair - 950-231845CIHR PJT-162427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCaring for children and youth with special health care needs (CYSHCN) is a significant undertaking for families. While respite care is intended to address this burden, demand continues to exceed supply. Exploring the perspectives of respite service providers (SPs) and stakeholders (SKs) provides unique insight into families' needs and respite care systems.

methodsWe conducted semistructured interviews with 41 respite care SPs and SKs across four Canadian provinces to ascertain perspectives on current and ideal respite care for families of CYSHCN. The analysis included delineating units of meaning from the data, clustering units of meaning to form thematic statements and extracting themes. The second-level analysis involved applying themes and subthemes to cross-functional process maps.

findingsParticipants noted the critical, but sometimes absent role of Community Service Workers, who have the ability to support families accessing and navigating respite care systems. SPs and SKs identified current respite systems as operating in crisis mode. New findings suggest an ideal respite care system would incorporate advocacy for families, empower families and value CYSHCN, their families and respite workers.

conclusionThe evidence of unmet respite care needs of families of CYSHCN across Canada has long been available. Our findings identifying respite system challenges and solutions can be used by funders and policymakers for planning and enhancing resources, and by healthcare professionals, respite care providers and SKs to understand barriers and take action to improve respite outcomes to meet the respite needs of all families and CYSHCN. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The research team is composed of patients, researchers, clinicians and decision-makers along with our Family Advisory Committee (FAC) composed of members of families of CYSHNC. The FAC was formed and met regularly with research team members, knowledge users and collaborators throughout the study to provide input on design, review themes and ensure findings are translated and disseminated in a meaningful way.

Indexed as

Interviews as TopicQualitative ResearchRespite CareAdolescentAdultCanadaChildChildren with DisabilitiesFamilyFemaleHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansMalechildrenCYSHCNprocess mapsqualitativerespiteservice providersspecial health care needsyouth

Identifiers

PMID37705308
PMCPMC10753137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.