Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37705086›Full record

ArticleStem cell research & therapy2023

Biodistribution of mesenchymal stromal cell-derived extracellular vesicles administered during acute lung injury.

Alvin Tieu, Duncan J Stewart, Damian Chwastek, Casey Lansdell, Dylan Burger, Manoj M Lalu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Peripheral nerve repair: innovations and future directions.Journal of translational medicine · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alvin TieuDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L1, Canada.
Duncan J StewartDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L1, Canada.
Damian ChwastekDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L1, Canada.
Casey LansdellDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L1, Canada.
Dylan BurgerDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L1, Canada.
Manoj M LaluDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L1, Canada. mlalu@toh.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0322-382X
University of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMesenchymal stromal cell-derived extracellular vesicles (MSC-EVs) are a promising cell-free therapy for acute lung injury (ALI). To date, no studies have investigated their biodistribution in ALI or discerned the timing of administration for maximal lung targeting, which are crucial considerations for clinical translation. Our study aimed to characterize a mouse model of ALI and establish the distribution kinetics and optimal timing of MSC-EV delivery during lung injury.

methodsMSC-EVs were isolated by ultracentrifugation alone (U/C) or tangential flow filtration with ultracentrifugation (TFF-U/C) and characterized by nanoparticle tracking analysis and western blot. A lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced mouse model of ALI was established to study the inflammatory response over 72 h. ALI was assessed by histological lung injury score, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cell count and inflammatory cytokines. For biodistribution studies, ALI mice were intravenously administered fluorescently labeled MSC-EVs to determine the optimal timing of administration and organ-specific biodistribution. Live in vivo and ex vivo fluorescence imaging was conducted at various timepoints post-EV injection.

resultsEVs isolated by either ultracentrifugation alone or TFF-U/C displayed comparable size distribution (~ 50-350 nm) and EV marker expression (CD63/81). TFF-U/C generated a 5.4-fold higher particle concentration and 3.9-fold higher total protein when compared to ultracentrifugation alone. From the inflammatory time-course study, cell count and IL-1β peaked in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid at 24 h after ALI induction. MSC-EVs delivered at 24 h (as opposed to 0.5 h, 5 h or 10 h) after disease induction resulted in a 2.7-4.4-fold higher lung uptake of EVs. Biodistribution studies comparing organ-specific MSC-EV uptake showed progressive lung accumulation up to 48 h post-delivery (threefold higher than the spleen/liver), with a decline at 72 h. Importantly, lung EV fluorescence at 48 h in ALI mice was significantly elevated as compared to control mice. The lung tropism of MSC-EVs was further validated as therapeutically inert EVs derived from HEK293T cells accumulated mainly to the spleen and liver with a 5.5-fold lower distribution to the lungs as compared to MSC-EVs.

conclusionMSC-EVs exhibit maximal lung accumulation when administered during heightened inflammation at 24 h after ALI induction. This lung tropism suggests that MSC-EVs may serve as a practical rescue treatment for acute inflammatory respiratory conditions.

Indexed as

Acute Lung InjuryExtracellular VesiclesAnimalsBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidDisease Models, AnimalHEK293 CellsHumansMiceTissue DistributionAcute lung injuryAcute respiratory distress syndromeBiodistributionExtracellular vesiclesMesenchymal stromal cells

Identifiers

PMID37705086
PMCPMC10500845
OpenAlexW4386723199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.