Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37704970›Full record

ReviewHealth research policy and systems2023

Equilibrium in the governance of cross-sectoral policies: how does it translate into practice?

Pernelle Smits, Johanne Préval, Jean-Louis Denis, Gerard Divay, Jacques Bourgeault, Nassera Touati

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health research policy and systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 83% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pernelle SmitsDepartement de Management, Université Laval, Montréal, Canada. Pernelle.Smits@fsa.ulaval.ca.
Johanne PrévalÉcole Nationale d'administration Publique, CRCHUM, Montréal, Canada.
Jean-Louis DenisUniversité de Montréal, CRCHUM, Montréal, Canada.
Gerard DivayÉcole Nationale d'administration Publique, CRCHUM, Montréal, Canada.
Jacques BourgeaultÉcole Nationale d'administration Publique, CRCHUM, Montréal, Canada.
Nassera TouatiÉcole Nationale d'administration Publique, CRCHUM, Montréal, Canada.
École Nationale d'Administration Publique · CAUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversité Laval · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is growing interest from health researchers in the governance of Health in All Policies (HiAP). Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic has re-ignited managers' interest in HiAP governance and in health prevention activities that involve actors from outside health ministries. Since the dynamics of these multi-actor, multi-sectoral policies are complex, the use of systems theory is a promising avenue toward understanding and improving HiAP governance. We focus on the concept of equilibrium within systems theory, especially as it points to the need to strike a balance between actors that goes beyond synergies or mimicry-a balance that is essential to HiAP governance.

methodWe mobilized two sources of data to understand how the concept of equilibrium applies to HiAP governance. First, we reviewed the literature on existing frameworks for collaborative governance, both in general and for HiAP specifically, in order to extract equilibrium-related elements. Second, we conducted an in-depth case study over three years of an HiAP implemented in Quebec, Canada.

resultsIn total, we identified 12 equilibrium-related elements relevant to HiAP governance and related to knowledge, actors, learning, mindsets, sustainability, principles, coordination, funding and roles. The equilibria were both operational and conceptual in nature.

conclusionsWe conclude that policy makers and policy implementers could benefit from mobilizing these 12 equilibrium-related elements to enhance HiAP governance. Evaluators of HiAP may also want to consider and integrate them into their governance assessments.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAdministrative PersonnelCanadaHealth PolicyHumansEquilibriumFrameworkGovernanceHiAPHorizontal

Identifiers

PMID37704970
PMCPMC10500808
OpenAlexW4386723203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.