ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2023
Disaster day: a simulation-based competition for educating emergency medicine residents and medical students on disaster medicine.
Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cluster analysis of participants' self-reported emotional and organizational responses during a large-scale disaster simulation exercise at a level 1 trauma center.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Enhancing emergency response in Somalia: Evaluating the WHO Mass Casualty Management course in trauma hospitals.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2026Article
- Gamification and Virtual Reality for Enhancing Disaster Preparedness Among University Students and Health Workers: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Disaster preparedness knowledge and experiences among nurses during a competitive tabletop exercise program.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Challenges and coping strategies of nursing interns in training for nationwide medical technical skills competition: a qualitative descriptive study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Article
- The pit crew card game: a novel gamification exercise to improve EMS performance in critical care scenarios.International journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Application of Gamification Teaching in Disaster Education: Scoping Review.JMIR serious games · 2024Article
- A Low-Cost, Low-Tech Virtual Mass Casualty Training Simulation for Undergraduate Medical Education.Cureus · 2024Article
- Shaping the future of healthcare: improving quality and safety through integrating simulation into Public Health education.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDisaster medicine is a growing field within the specialty of emergency medicine, but educational training typically focuses on hospital drills or other educational strategies, such as didactics, simulation, or tabletop exercises. With the success of gamification in other medical education applications, we sought to investigate if a novel gamified curricular innovation would lead to improved test performance and confidence in the ability to manage a real mass casualty incident (MCI).
methodsThis was a prospective observational study of medical students and emergency medicine residents who participated in a 4-h simulation-based competition consisting of 4 unique stations. Each station had learning objectives associated with the content taught. Learners completed a pre-event survey, followed by participation in the competitive gamification event, and subsequently completed a post-event survey. Differences between pre- and post-event responses were matched and analyzed using paired and unpaired t tests for medical knowledge assessments, the Mann-Whitney U test for perceptions of confidence in the ability to manage an MCI event, and descriptive statistics provided on perceptions of the effectiveness of this educational strategy.
resultsWe analyzed data from 49 learners with matched (and unmatched) pre- and post-event survey responses. There was a statistically significant increase in medical knowledge assessment scores in both unmatched group means and available matched data (47 to 69%, p < 0.01, and 50 to 69%, p < 0.05). Self-reported confidence in the ability to handle an MCI scenario also significantly increased (p < 0.01). Finally, 100% of respondents indicated they "agreed" or "strongly agreed" that the event was an effective education tool for disaster preparedness and training.
conclusionsIn this study, we found that learners perceived a novel gamification event as an effective educational tool, which led to improved learner knowledge and self-reported confidence in the ability to manage a real MCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.