ArticleNeurocritical care2024
Early Celecoxib use in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.
Article in Neurocritical care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors for Headache After Elective Cranial Neurosurgery: Results from a Systematic Review of Efficacy of Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors for Headache After Acute Brain Injury.Neurocritical care · 2025Pooled it
- Arachidonic acid metabolism in spinal cord injury.Journal of advanced research · 2026Review
- Glial Cell Dynamics in Neuroinflammation: Mechanisms, Interactions, and Therapeutic Implications.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Traumatic Brain Injury: Advances in Diagnostic Techniques and Treatment Modalities.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Neuroinflammation: Mechanisms, Dual Roles, and Therapeutic Strategies in Neurological Disorders.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Effects of early propranolol administration on mortality from severe, traumatic brain injury: a retrospective propensity score-matched registry study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025Article
- From imaging to intervention: emerging potential of PET biomarkers to shape therapeutic strategies for TBI-induced neurodegeneration.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Early Celecoxib Use in Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage is Associated with Reduced Mortality.Neurocritical care · 2024Article
- Dynamic Changes and Effects of HBiochemical genetics · 2024Article
- Review
- Efficacy of Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors for Headache in Acute Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.Research square · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraumatic brain injury (TBI) can cause rapid brain inflammation. There is debate over the safety and efficacy of anti-inflammatory agents in its treatment. With a particular focus on cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2) selective inhibition, we sought to determine the impact of celecoxib versus no celecoxib treatment on outcomes in patients with TBI and compare these with outcomes associated with nonselective COX inhibition (ibuprofen) and corticosteroid (dexamethasone) treatment.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study used TriNetX, a large publicly available global health research network, to gather clinical data extracted from the electronic medical records. Using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision and pharmacy codes, we identified patients with TBI who were and were not treated with celecoxib, ibuprofen, and dexamethasone. Analysis was performed on propensity-matched and unmatched cohorts, which were matched on demographics, comorbidities, and neurological injuries. Our primary end point was 1-year survival. Secondary end points were ventilator and tracheostomy dependence, gastrostomy tube placement, seizures, and craniotomy.
resultsAfter propensity score matching, a total of 1443 patients were identified in both the celecoxib and no celecoxib cohorts. Ninety-two (6.4%) patients in the celecoxib cohort died within 1 year following TBI versus 145 (10.0%) in the no celecoxib cohort (odds ratio 0.61; 95% confidence interval 0.46-0.80; p = 0.0003). The 1-year survival rate was 96.1% in the celecoxib cohort versus 93.1% in the no celecoxib cohort (p < 0.0001). At the end of the 1-year period, celecoxib was associated with significantly lower gastrostomy tube dependence (p = 0.017), seizure activity (p = 0.027), and myocardial infarction (p = 0.021) compared with the control cohort. Ibuprofen was also associated with higher 1-year survival probability and lower rates of post-TBI complications. Dexamethasone was broadly associated with higher morbidity but was associated with higher 1-year survival probability compared with the no dexamethasone cohort.
conclusionsEarly celecoxib and ibuprofen use within 5 days post TBI was associated with higher 1-year survival probabilities and fewer complications. With emerging yet controversial preclinical evidence to suggest that COX inhibition improves TBI outcomes, this population-level study offers suggestive support for these drugs' clinical benefit, which should be pursued in prospective clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37704936What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.