SynthesisCellular and molecular neurobiology2023
Liquid Biopsy in Low-Grade Glioma: A Systematic Review and a Proposal for a Clinical Utility Score.
Synthesis in Cellular and molecular neurobiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrative analysis of mitochondrial-related gene profiling identifies prognostic clusters and drug resistance mechanisms in low-grade glioma.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Exosomal non-coding RNAs: orchestrators of intercellular crosstalk in the prostate cancer tumor microenvironment.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Extracellular Vesicle microRNA: A Promising Biomarker and Therapeutic Target for Respiratory Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liquid biopsy research on Low-Grade gliomas (LGG) has remained less conspicuous than that on other malignant brain tumors. Reliable serum markers would be precious for diagnosis, follow- up and treatment. We propose a clinical utility score (CUS) for biomarkers in LGG that mirrors their clinical usefulness. We conducted a PRISMA review. We examined each biomarker classifying them by CUS and Level of Evidence (LOE). We identified four classes of biomarkers: (1). Circulating protein-(a) vitronectin discriminates LGG from HGG (Sn:98%, Sp:91%, CUS: 3, LOE: III), (b) CTLA-4 discriminates LGG from HGG, (cutoff: 220.43 pg/ml, Sn: 82%, Sp: 78%, CUS:3, LOE:III), (c) pre-operative TGF b1 predict astrocytoma (cutoff: 2.52 ng/ml, Sn: 94.9%, Sp: 100%, CUS:3, LOE:VI). (2). micro-RNA (miR)-(a) miR-16 discriminates between WHO IV and WHO II and III groups (AUC = 0.98, CUS:3, LOE: III), (b) miR-454-3p is higher in HGG than in LGG (p = 0.013, CUS:3, LOE: III), (c) miR-210 expression is related to WHO grades (Sn 83.2%, Sp 94.3%, CUS: 3, LOE: III). (3). Circulating DNA-(a) IDH1R132H mutation detected in plasma by combined COLD and digital PCR (Sn: 60%, Sp: 100%, CUS: 3, LOE: III). 4. Exosomes-(a) SDC1 serum levels could discriminate GBM from LGG (Sn: 71%, Sp: 91%, CUS: 2C, LOE: VI). Our investigation showed that miRs appear to have the highest clinical utility. The LOE of the studies assessed is generally low. A combined approach between different biomarkers and traditional diagnostics may be considered. We identified four main classes of biomarkers produced by LGG. We examined each biomarker, classifying them by clinical utility score (CUS) and level of evidence (LOE). Micro-RNA (miRs) appears to have the highest CUS and LOE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.