ArticleWorld journal of urology2023
The impact of AirSeal
Article in World journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis compared the safety and effectiveness of the AirSeal system with traditional pneumoperitoneum systems in robot-assisted laparoscopic urologic surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Comparative assessment of safety and efficacy between the AirSeal system and conventional insufflation system in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Pooled it
- AirSealBMC urology · 2026Article
- Impact of intra-abdominal pressure with AirSealWorld journal of urology · 2025Article
- Underneath Images and Robots, Looking Deeper into the Pneumoperitoneum: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy outcomes with airseal® versus conventional insufflation: A single tertiary center comparative study.Therapeutic advances in urologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe aimed to compare perioperative outcomes, post-operative complications, and opioid use between AirSeal
methodsWe retrospectively collected data on 326 patients who underwent elective RARP at our institution either with or without AirSeal
resultsThe AirSeal
conclusionRARP using AirSeal
Indexed as
Identifiers
37704868What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.