Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37704860›Full record

ReviewUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023

[Role of nutrition in urological prehabilitation].

Imke Thederan, Birgit-Christiane Zyriax, Hans Heinzer

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Imke ThederanMartini-Klinik am UKE GmbH, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland. i.thederan@uke.de.
Birgit-Christiane ZyriaxUniversitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Hans HeinzerMartini-Klinik am UKE GmbH, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nutritional intervention plays an important role in prehabilitation, a multimodal concept designed to improve the physical condition of the patient prior to treatment in order to influence the outcome of surgery. The focus is on reducing the postoperative complication rate, while simultaneously shortening the hospital stay and the rehabilitation phase. The nutritional status should be optimized through individual counseling and the targeted intake of calories, protein, and nutritional supplements. A good nutritional status contributes to the strengthening of the immune system and improves wound healing. Especially after surgery, muscle mass declines rapidly. Adequate protein intake accompanying strength exercises can best preserve muscle and promote development of muscular fitness during prehabilitation. Despite the positive effects of nutritional interventions, prehabilitation programs with nutritional components in uro-oncology are rare and the evidence of the programs is therefore insufficient. Results from initial studies appear promising, but further prospective, randomized studies of high quality and with defined program content on the various types of cancer are needed.

Indexed as

Postoperative ComplicationsPreoperative CareUrologic Surgical ProceduresDietary SupplementsHumansNutritional StatusPreoperative ExerciseConvalescenceEnhanced recovery after surgeryLength of stayScreeningUrology neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID37704860
OpenAlexW4386699493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.