Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37704804›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2023

Is there evidence that e-cigarettes promote an increased risk of dental caries?

Ana Luisa Amaral, Bashir Abdulgader Lwaleed, Sérgio Araújo Andrade

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Ana Luisa AmaralFaculty of Dentistry, University of Itaúna (UIT), Itaúna, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0008-6919-8736
Bashir Abdulgader LwaleedSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5748-4892
Sérgio Araújo AndradeFaculty of Dentistry, University of Itaúna (UIT), Itaúna, MG, Brazil. saandrade@ufsj.edu.br.ORCID 0000-0003-1817-3025
Federal University of São João del-Rei · BRUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

data sourcesThis study was conducted on a sample of patients who attended the dental clinic at Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, between January 1, 2019 and January 1, 2022. Ethical approval was obtained before commencing the research. STUDY SELECTION: This cross-sectional study was carried out through an electronic search of electronic records. It includes patients aged over 16 years, both electronic cigarette (e-cigarettes) users and non-users, with recorded caries risk assessments. Patients with a history of recreational drug use or lacking a caries diagnosis were excluded. The Caries Management by Risk Assessment (CAMBRA) was utilized to indicate and classify caries risk. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Descriptive statistics, multivariate and bivariate analyzes were used to assess the relationship between use of e-cigarettes and caries risk level. SPSS software, Version 26 (IBM) was used in the analysis with significance level set at α = 0.05.

resultsOut of a total of 13,216 patients included in the research, 13,080 (99.3%) self-declared as non-users of e-cigarettes, and 136 (0.69%) were e-cigarette users. There was a statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) in caries risk levels between e-cigarette users (6.6% low, 14.3% moderate, and 79.1% high caries risk level) and control group (14.5% low, 25.9% moderate, and 59.6% high caries risk level).

conclusionsThe study provides evidence supporting the notion that e-cigarette users exhibit a high level of caries risk.

Indexed as

Dental CariesElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsAgedCross-Sectional StudiesHumansRisk AssessmentSmokers

Identifiers

PMID37704804
OpenAlexW4386707898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.