Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37704777›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2023

Applications of new radiological scores: the Node-rads in colon cancer staging.

Nicola Maggialetti, Chiara Noemi Greco, Nicola Maria Lucarelli, Chiara Morelli, Valentina Cianci, Sara Sasso, Dino Rubini, Arnaldo Scardapane, Amato Antonio Stabile Ianora

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nicola Maggialetti *Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124, Bari, Italy.
Chiara Noemi Greco *Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124, Bari, Italy.
Nicola Maria LucarelliInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124, Bari, Italy.
Chiara MorelliInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124, Bari, Italy. dottchiaramorelli@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3970-7479
Valentina CianciInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124, Bari, Italy.
Sara SassoInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124, Bari, Italy.
Dino RubiniDepartment of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138, Naples, Italy.
Arnaldo ScardapaneInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124, Bari, Italy.
Amato Antonio Stabile IanoraInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124, Bari, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe study focuses on the evaluation of the new Node Reporting and Data System 1.0 (Node-rads) scoring accuracy in the assessment of metastatic lymph nodes (LN) in patients with colon carcinoma. MATERIAL AND

methodsFrom April 2021 to May 2022, retrospective chart reviews were performed on 67 preoperative CT (Computed Tomography) of patients undergoing excisional surgery for colon cancer at the Polyclinic of Bari, Italy. Primary endpoints were to assess lymph node size and configuration to express the likelihood of a metastatic site adopting the Node-rads score system, whose categories of risk are defined from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). The nodal postsurgical histological evaluation was the gold standard. The relationship between Node-rads score, LN size, configuration criteria (texture, border and shape) and the presence of histological metastases was statistically evaluated.

resultsAll surgical specimens examined had correlation with Node-rads score. They were significantly more likely to present nodes micrometastasis those patients with (a) spherical LN shape (82.8%), (b) with lymph node necrosis (100%), (c) irregular borders (87%) and (d) the LN short axis more than 10 mm (61.9%).

conclusionsOur experience highlights how the Node-rads system proposes an intuitive and effective definition of criteria to standardize the lymph node radiological reports in colon cancer disease. Further studies are needed to streamline the classification of the nodal and peripheral LN in all the oncological imaging.

Indexed as

Colonic DiseasesColonic NeoplasmsHumansLymph NodesNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesColon cancerColon cancer stagingComputed tomography (CT)Lymph nodesNode-rads

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.