Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37704600›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Variation in spatial dependencies across the cortical mantle discriminates the functional behaviour of primary and association cortex.

Robert Leech, Reinder Vos De Wael, František Váša, Ting Xu, R Austin Benn, Robert Scholz, Rodrigo M Braga, Michael P Milham, Jessica Royer, Boris C Bernhardt and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Robust FDR Control for Neuroimaging-based Classification via Knockoffs.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The effect of spherical projection on spin tests for brain maps.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Robert LeechCentre for Neuroimaging Science, King's College London, London, UK. robert.leech@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5801-6318
Reinder Vos De WaelMcConnell Brain Imaging Centre, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
František VášaCentre for Neuroimaging Science, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6744-7139
Ting XuCenter for the Developing Brain, Child Mind Institute, New York, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0065-3832
R Austin BennIntegrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center (UMR 8002), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) and Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Robert ScholzMax Planck School of Cognition, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7061-4882
Rodrigo M BragaNeurology, Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Michael P MilhamCenter for the Developing Brain, Child Mind Institute, New York, USA.
Jessica RoyerMcConnell Brain Imaging Centre, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Boris C BernhardtMcConnell Brain Imaging Centre, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9256-6041
Emily J H JonesCentre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck College, University of London, London, UK.
Elizabeth JefferiesDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York, UK.
Daniel S MarguliesIntegrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center (UMR 8002), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) and Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Jonathan SmallwoodDepartment of Psychology, Queens University, Kingston, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7298-2459

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R005370/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent theories of cortical organisation suggest features of function emerge from the spatial arrangement of brain regions. For example, association cortex is located furthest from systems involved in action and perception. Association cortex is also 'interdigitated' with adjacent regions having different patterns of functional connectivity. It is assumed that topographic properties, such as distance between regions, constrains their functions, however, we lack a formal description of how this occurs. Here we use variograms, a quantification of spatial autocorrelation, to profile how function changes with the distance between cortical regions. We find function changes with distance more gradually within sensory-motor cortex than association cortex. Importantly, systems within the same type of cortex (e.g., fronto-parietal and default mode networks) have similar profiles. Primary and association cortex, therefore, are differentiated by how function changes over space, emphasising the value of topographical features of a region when estimating its contribution to cognition and behaviour.

Indexed as

CognitionSensorimotor CortexSpatial Analysis

Identifiers

PMID37704600
PMCPMC10499916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.