Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37704532›Full record

ArticleResearch in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP2024

Using Protection Motivation Theory to develop a survey of over-the-counter decision-making by older adults.

Apoorva C Reddy, Michelle A Chui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Apoorva C ReddySocial and Administrative Sciences Division, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Pharmacy, 777 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Michelle A ChuiSocial and Administrative Sciences Division, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Pharmacy, 777 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53705, USA; Sonderegger Research Center for Improved Medication Outcomes, 777 Highland Ave, Madison, WI, 53705, USA. Electronic address: Michelle.chui@wisc.edu.

Funding

NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002375 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Vivek Prabhakaran · 2017 to 2026
$8.4M
Improving Over-the-Counter Medication Safety for Older AdultsR18HS024490 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CHUI, MICHELLE ANNE · 2016 to 2018
$1.4M
AHRQ HHS R18 HS024490NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002375
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOlder adults (aged 65+) are responsible for 30% of the over-the-counter (OTC) medication use in the US. Each year, over 175,000 older adults are hospitalized due to OTC-related adverse drug events (ADEs). A major barrier to improving OTC use has been the dearth of actionable research on factors that affect older adult decision-making during OTC selection. Risk perception and health literacy are two such factors known to impact health behavior. However, to date no studies have characterized risk perceptions of OTCs nor how they relate to health literacy in the decision-making processes of older adults.

objectiveThis paper presents the development and validation of a survey instrument to measure older adults' risk perception toward over-the-counter medications. The survey also explores the relation of risk perception to health literacy efficacy.

methodsThe Protection Motivation Theory (PMT) and the Tripartite Risk Perception Model (TRIRISK model) formed the basis for conceptualizing relationships between this study's constructs of interest. The utility of the PMT and the TRIRISK model in the context of OTC medication safety was tested in a survey of 103 older adults; exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and Spearman's correlation coefficients were used to test construct validity.

resultsThe EFA yielded a 4-factor model of protection motivation, which included deliberative risk perception, emotional risk perception, perceived threat severity, and perceived coping efficacy. The EFA-based item reduction resulted in a final 14-item OTC Protection Motivation survey.

conclusionThe survey generated through this study is a tool for characterizing older adult risk perceptions of OTCs. The development of a measure of OTC risk perceptions is a promising step toward designing and evaluating patient-centered interventions to improve older adult medication safety.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsMotivationAgedHealth BehaviorHumansNonprescription DrugsSurveys and QuestionnairesNonprescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID37704532
PMCPMC10843085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.