Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37704232›Full record

ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2023

The SAFE (Social Accountability as the Framework for Engagement) for Health Institutions project: Rapid evidence narratives.

Alex Anawati, Nusha Ramsoondar, Erin Cameron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Equipping family physicians to thrive: Scholarship as a core competency.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Purpose of a family medicine journal: Clinical relevance, social accountability, or both?Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alex AnawatiAssociate Professor, co-lead of the SAFE (Social Accountability as the Framework for Engagement) for Health Institutions project, and Physician Clinical Lead for Leadership, Advocacy, and Policy in the Centre for Social Accountability at Northern Ontario School of Medicine (NOSM) University and Health Sciences North in Sudbury, Ont; and has been a member of the College of Family Physicians of Canada's Social Accountability Working Group.
Nusha RamsoondarMedical student at NOSM University in Thunder Bay, Ont.
Erin CameronAssociate Professor, co-lead of the SAFE for Health Institutions project, and Director of the Centre for Social Accountability at NOSM University.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

problem addressedFamily physicians stand to benefit from assistance with the implementation of social accountability strategies. OBJECTIVE OF PROGRAM: To develop rapid evidence narratives for key social accountability topics that summarize and mobilize evidence for practical use in social accountability strategies linking front-line, "bottom-up" actions with complementary "top-down" standards from the SAFE (Social Accountability as the Framework for Engagement) for Health Institutions evaluation tool. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: The SAFE for Health Institutions project aims to accelerate transformation toward greater social accountability in family medicine practices and in other settings where family physicians work. A social accountability evaluation tool was developed to help with this transformation and includes a framework of 253 comprehensive top-down standards. Key social accountability topics linked to these standards were identified for rapid reviews of the literature, conducted between June and November 2021, with evidence reported as narratives. These rapid evidence narratives provide practical, evidence-based context including suggestions on how to address each topic across the micro, meso, and macro levels of care, connecting bottom-up actions with corresponding considerations for top-down policies, processes, and structures. Summaries of the rapid evidence narratives are being developed as a series of articles for

conclusionRapid evidence narratives that summarize and mobilize evidence on key social accountability topics further the understanding of social accountability in family medicine and in other settings where family physicians work. Mapping actions across the micro, meso, and macro levels of care is a practical way to link front-line, bottom-up actions with a top-down social accountability strategy.

Indexed as

Family PracticePhysicians, FamilyCanadaHumansNarrationSocial Responsibility

Identifiers

PMID37704232
PMCPMC10498899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.