ArticleGenomics & informatics2023
Single-cell RNA sequencing identifies distinct transcriptomic signatures between PMA/ionomycin- and αCD3/αCD28-activated primary human T cells.
Article in Genomics & informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Autofluorescence lifetime imaging resolves cell heterogeneity within peripheral blood mononuclear cells.Biophotonics discovery · 2026Article
- Comparable restimulation of human T cells activated with CD3/CD28 beads versus soluble antibody complexes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Autofluorescence lifetime imaging resolves cell heterogeneity within peripheral blood mononuclear cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Resident T cell activation leads to human hair follicle immune privilege lossFrontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Mechanisms of T cell activation: Integrating signaling pathways, experimental models, and therapeutic implications.EXCLI journal · 2026Review
- Claudin-4 as a dual regulator of genome stability and immune evasion in high grade serous ovarian cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Proteogenomics Reveals Microproteins in Activated T Cells.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2025Article
- A greater frequency of circulating CCR7loPD-1hi follicular helper T cells indicates a durable clinical cure after Peg IFN-α therapy in chronic hepatitis B patients.Hepatology communications · 2025Article
- Establishment and validation of red fox (vulpes vulpes) airway epithelial cell cultures at the air-liquid-interface.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- CryoSCAPE: Scalable immune profiling using cryopreserved whole blood for multi-omic single cell and functional assays.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Long-read sequencing reveals novel transcript diversity inAnimal cells and systems · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of whole plant, flower and root extracts ofFrontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Immunologists have activated T cells in vitro using various stimulation methods, including phorbol myristate acetate (PMA)/ionomycin and αCD3/αCD28 agonistic antibodies. PMA stimulates protein kinase C, activating nuclear factor-κB, and ionomycin increases intracellular calcium levels, resulting in activation of nuclear factor of activated T cell. In contrast, αCD3/αCD28 agonistic antibodies activate T cells through ZAP-70, which phosphorylates linker for activation of T cell and SH2-domain-containing leukocyte protein of 76 kD. However, despite the use of these two different in vitro T cell activation methods for decades, the differential effects of chemical-based and antibody-based activation of primary human T cells have not yet been comprehensively described. Using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) technologies to analyze gene expression unbiasedly at the single-cell level, we compared the transcriptomic profiles of the non-physiological and physiological activation methods on human peripheral blood mononuclear cell-derived T cells from four independent donors. Remarkable transcriptomic differences in the expression of cytokines and their respective receptors were identified. We also identified activated CD4 T cell subsets (CD55+) enriched specifically by PMA/ionomycin activation. We believe this activated human T cell transcriptome atlas derived from two different activation methods will enhance our understanding, highlight the optimal use of these two in vitro T cell activation assays, and be applied as a reference standard when analyzing activated specific disease-originated T cells through scRNA-seq.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.