Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37703867›Full record

ReviewGynecologic and obstetric investigation2024

Immunotherapy for Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia: A New Paradigm.

Inge O Baas, Anneke M Westermann, Benoit You, Pierre-Adrien Bolze, Michael Seckl, Ehsan Ghorani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gynecologic and obstetric investigation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Diagnosis and management of gestational trophoblastic disease: 2025 update.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Inge O BaasDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands, i.o.baas-3@umcutrecht.nl.
Anneke M WestermannDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Benoit YouUniversité Lyon 1, Hospices Civils De Lyon, Centre Français De Référence Des Maladies Trophoblastiques, Hôpital Lyon Sud, CITOHL, EA 3738 CICLY, Univ Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Pierre-Adrien BolzeUniversité Lyon 1, Hospices Civils De Lyon, Centre Français De Référence Des Maladies Trophoblastiques, Hôpital Lyon Sud, CITOHL, EA 3738 CICLY, Univ Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Michael SecklDepartment of Medical Oncology, Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Centre, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK.
Ehsan GhoraniDepartment of Medical Oncology, Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Centre, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune checkpoint immunotherapy (CPI) targeting programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/ligand (PD-L1) has been shown to be an effective treatment for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN). This includes those with multidrug resistance, ultra-high-risk disease, and epithelioid trophoblastic tumour/placental site trophoblastic tumour subtypes that are inherently chemotherapy resistant, but there is also emerging evidence in low-risk disease.

objectivesWe set out to generate an overview of the current data supporting the use of CPI for GTN in both high-risk and low-risk disease and to consider future research goals and directions in order to implement CPI in current treatment guidelines.

methodsWe identified and reviewed the published data on the use of CPI agents in GTN. OUTCOME: 133 patients were identified who had been treated with CPI for GTN with pembrolizumab (23), avelumab (22), camrelizumab (57), toripalimab (15), or other anti-PD-1 agents (16), of whom 118 had high-risk diseases, relapse or multi-drug resistant disease, and 15 low-risk diseases. Overall 85 patients achieved complete remission, 77 (of 118) with high-risk disease, and 8 (of 15) with low-risk disease. 1 patient with complete remission in the high-risk group developed a relapse 22 months after anti-PD-1 treatment had been stopped. Treatment was generally well tolerated across studies. CONCLUSIONS AND OUTLOOK: The majority of high-risk patients (77/118) treated with CPI are cured and this is particularly relevant amongst those with chemotherapy resistant disease who otherwise have very limited treatment options. Priorities for future research include determining whether these agents have a role earlier in the disease course, the utility of combination with chemotherapy, and effects on future fertility. Treatment availability remains a concern due to the high price of these agents.

Indexed as

Gestational Trophoblastic DiseaseImmunotherapyFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsPregnancyImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsGestational trophoblastic neoplasiaImmune checkpoint immunotherapy(Inter)national treatment guidelinesMultidrug resistance

Identifiers

PMID37703867
PMCPMC11152029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.