Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37703820›Full record

ReviewStem cell reports2023

ISSCR standards for the use of human stem cells in basic research.

Tenneille E Ludwig, Peter W Andrews, Ivana Barbaric, Nissim Benvenisty, Anita Bhattacharyya, Jeremy M Crook, Laurence M Daheron, Jonathan S Draper, Lyn E Healy, Meritxell Huch and 17 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 20 institutions in 15 countries.

Tenneille E LudwigWiCell Research Institute, Madison, WI, USA. Electronic address: tludwig@wicell.org.
Peter W AndrewsThe University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Ivana BarbaricThe University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Nissim BenvenistyHebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Anita BhattacharyyaUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Jeremy M CrookThe University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW Australia; Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; The University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Laurence M DaheronHarvard Stem Cell Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Jonathan S DraperStem Cell Network, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Lyn E HealyFrancis Crick Institute, London, UK.
Meritxell HuchMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany.
Maneesha S InamdarJawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Institute for Stem Cell Science and Regenerative Medicine, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Kim B JensenNovo Nordisk Foundation Center for Stem Cell Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Andreas KurtzFraunhofer Institute for Biomedical Engineering, Sulzbach, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health at Charité, Berlin, Germany.
Madeline A LancasterMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK.
Prisca LiberaliFriedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basal, Switzerland.
Matthias P LutolfSwiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Basel, Switzerland.
Christine L MummeryLeiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Martin F PeraThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.
Yoji SatoNational Institute of Health Sciences, Kawasaki, Japan.
Noriko ShimasakiCenter for iPS Research and Application, Kyoto, Japan; Prefectural University of Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan; National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Austin G SmithUniversity of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Jihwan SongCHA University, Seoul, Korea; iPS Bio, Inc, Seoul, Korea.
Claudia SpitsVrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Glyn StaceyInternational Stem Cell Banking Initiative, Barley, Herts, UK.
Christine A WellsUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Tongbiao ZhaoInstitute of Zoology Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Beijing, China.
Jack T MosherInternational Society for Stem Cell Research, Evanston, IL, USA.
University of Sheffield · GBBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEChinese Academy of Sciences · CNÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHFriedrich Miescher Institute · CHHarvard Stem Cell Institute · USHebrew University of Jerusalem · ILJackson Laboratory · USJawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research · INKorea University · KRLeiden University Medical Center · NLMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics · DEMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology · GBNational Institute of Health Sciences · JPNational University of Singapore · SGStem Cell Network · CAThe Francis Crick Institute · GBThe University of Melbourne · AUThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Cancer Research UK CC0199Medical Research Council CC0199Medical Research Council G1100526Medical Research Council G1100526/2Medical Research Council MC_UP_1201/9Medical Research Council MR/R015724/1Medical Research Council MR/X000028/1Medical Research Council MR/X007979/1Wellcome Trust CC0199
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The laboratory culture of human stem cells seeks to capture a cellular state as an in vitro surrogate of a biological system. For the results and outputs from this research to be accurate, meaningful, and durable, standards that ensure reproducibility and reliability of the data should be applied. Although such standards have been previously proposed for repositories and distribution centers, no widely accepted best practices exist for laboratory research with human pluripotent and tissue stem cells. To fill that void, the International Society for Stem Cell Research has developed a set of recommendations, including reporting criteria, for scientists in basic research laboratories. These criteria are designed to be technically and financially feasible and, when implemented, enhance the reproducibility and rigor of stem cell research.

Indexed as

Stem Cell ResearchHumansReproducibility of ResultshESCShIPSCshumanmodel systemsorganoidstissue stem cells

Identifiers

PMID37703820
PMCPMC10545481
OpenAlexW4386636748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.