Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37703237›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Primate richness and abundance is driven by both forest structure and conservation scenario in Costa Rica.

Christopher Eric Johnson, Kathryn A Tafoya, Peter Beck, Amy Concilio, Kurt E White, Rodolfo Quirós, Michael D Wasserman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christopher Eric JohnsonDepartment of Anthropology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0715-5059
Kathryn A TafoyaCenter for the Integrative Study of Animal Behavior, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States of America.
Peter BeckDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, St. Edward's University, Austin, TX, United States of America.
Amy ConcilioDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, St. Edward's University, Austin, TX, United States of America.
Kurt E WhiteDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States of America.
Rodolfo QuirósLas Cruces Research Station, Organization for Tropical Studies, San Vito, Costa Rica.
Michael D WassermanDepartment of Anthropology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1611-024X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Variation in tropical forest management directly affects biodiversity and provisioning of ecosystem services on a global scale, thus it is necessary to compare forests under different conservation approaches such as protected areas, payments for ecosystem services programs (PES), and ecotourism, as well as forests lacking any formal conservation plan. To examine the effectiveness of specific conservation approaches, we examined differences in forest structure and tree recruitment, including canopy cover; canopy height; seedling, sapling, and adult tree density; and average and total diameter at breast height (DBH) across 78 plots in 18 forests across Costa Rica representing protected areas, private forests utilizing PES and/or ecotourism, and private forests not utilizing these economic incentives. The effectiveness of conservation approaches in providing suitable primate habitat was assessed by conducting broad primate census surveys across a subset of eight forests to determine species richness and group encounter rate of three primate species: mantled howler monkey (Alouatta palliata), Central American spider monkey (Ateles geoffroyi), and the white-faced capuchin monkey (Cebus imitator). Only canopy height was significantly different across the three approaches, with protected areas conserving the tallest and likely oldest forests. Canopy height was also significantly associated with the group encounter rate for both mantled howler and spider monkeys, but not for capuchins. Total group encounter rate for all three monkey species combined was higher in incentivized forests than in protected areas, with capuchin and howler monkey group encounter rates driving the trend. Group encounter rate for spider monkeys was higher in protected areas than in incentivized forests. Incentivized conservation (PES and ecotourism) and protected areas are paragons of land management practices that can lead to variation in forest structure across a landscape, which not only protect primate communities, but support the dietary ecologies of sympatric primate species.

Indexed as

Ateles geoffroyiAtelinaeAlouattaAnimalsCebusCosta RicaEcosystemForestsTrees

Identifiers

PMID37703237
PMCPMC10499215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.