Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37703229›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

The German Revised version of the Niigata PPPD Questionnaire (NPQ-R): Development with patient interviews and an expert Delphi consensus.

Frank Behrendt, Michaela Stark, Sarah Chételat, Stefan Schädler, Wiebke Trost, Katrin Parmar, Hans Ulrich Gerth, Leo H Bonati, Corina Schuster-Amft

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Italian validation of the Niigata Questionnaire to assess the severity of persistent postural-perceptual dizziness.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Frank BehrendtResearch Department, Reha Rheinfelden, Rheinfelden, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6967-0000
Michaela StarkSchool of Health Sciences, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Sarah ChételatSchool of Health Sciences, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Stefan SchädlerResearch Department, Reha Rheinfelden, Rheinfelden, Switzerland.
Wiebke TrostResearch Department, Reha Rheinfelden, Rheinfelden, Switzerland.
Katrin ParmarResearch Department, Reha Rheinfelden, Rheinfelden, Switzerland.
Hans Ulrich GerthResearch Department, Reha Rheinfelden, Rheinfelden, Switzerland.
Leo H BonatiResearch Department, Reha Rheinfelden, Rheinfelden, Switzerland.
Corina Schuster-AmftResearch Department, Reha Rheinfelden, Rheinfelden, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1120-4423

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersistent postural-perceptual dizziness (PPPD) is a functional disorder of the nervous system and currently one of the most common types of chronic dizziness. Currently existing questionnaires do not fully assess patients' specific symptoms of PPPD. The Japanese Niigata PPPD Questionnaire (NPQ) was recently developed following consensus-based diagnosis criteria. The aim of this study was to translate it into German, evaluate its content with the help of experts and patients and, if necessary, revise the original version to allow for a comprehensive assessment of patients' PPPD-related symptoms.

methodsA 3-round expert Delphi survey and semi-structured patient interviews were conducted. 28 experts from Switzerland, Germany and Austria working in hospitals or outpatient centres were asked to complete a first questionnaire on various aspects of PPPD, on the translated, original NPQ and their own related experiences (Round one), a second questionnaire with statements regarding PPPD they could agree or disagree with using a 6-point Likert-scale (Round two), and a third survey to finally reach a consensus on statements to be integrated into the NPQ. In addition, eleven patients (mean age of 64.6±12.6 years; 6 females) were selected according to the criteria for the diagnosis of PPPD proposed by the Bárány Society and participated in a semi-structured interview asking for their opinion on the content of the original NPQ. All collected data were analysed using a descriptive evaluation and a qualitative content analysis based on verbatim transcripts.

resultsSeven new items were added to the NPQ based on expert and patient comments and ratings. Its revised version (NPQ-R) comprises 19 items divided into five subscales using a 7-point Likert-scale with two additional subscales relating to associated symptoms and symptom behaviour in PPPD. The new maximal score is 114 points compared to 72 for the NPQ.

conclusionThe NPQ-R is the first patient-reported outcome measurement for patients with PPPD in German. It should help to provide a comprehensive assessment of the intensity of PPPD in affected patients.

Indexed as

DizzinessPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAgedData CollectionDelphi TechniqueFemaleHumansMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID37703229
PMCPMC10499244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.