Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37703100›Full record

ArticleJournal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association2024

Development of the Preschool Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation (PS-LIBRE1-5) Profile.

Khushbu F Patel, Pengsheng Ni, Kate E Surette, Camerin A Rencken, Silvanys L Rodríguez-Mercedes, Madeleine B McGwin, Renata Fabia, Carrie Tully, Petra Warner, Kathleen S Romanowski and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Development for the Teen-Aged Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation (TA-LIBRE12-19) Profile.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Khushbu F PatelShriners Children's Boston, Boston, MA, USA.
Pengsheng NiBoston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1774-2185
Kate E SuretteShriners Children's Boston, Boston, MA, USA.
Camerin A RenckenShriners Children's Boston, Boston, MA, USA.
Silvanys L Rodríguez-MercedesShriners Children's Boston, Boston, MA, USA.
Madeleine B McGwinShriners Children's Boston, Boston, MA, USA.
Renata FabiaNationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5399-5310
Carrie TullyChildren's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0399-5889
Petra WarnerShriners Children's Ohio, Dayton, OH, USA.
Kathleen S RomanowskiShriners Children's Northern California, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Tina PalmieriShriners Children's Northern California, Sacramento, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6340-1715
Frederick J StoddardMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Jeffrey C SchneiderHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Lewis E KazisBoston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Colleen M RyanShriners Children's Boston, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

ACL HHS 90DPBU0001ACL HHS 90DPBU0008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical, social, and psychological outcomes have been identified as relevant to the rehabilitation process of children with burn injuries. Existing legacy measures are limited in item content and only cover a few constructs. Condition-specific outcomes are highly relevant to gauge early growth and development. Computerized adaptive tests (CATs) leveraging advanced psychometric technologies minimize respondent burden. This project developed PS-LIBRE1-5 Profile CAT (Preschool Life Impact Burn Recovery Evaluation) to measure relevant postburn outcomes in children aged one to five. Responses to the field-tested PS-LIBRE1-5 Profile (188 items) were measured on a scale of frequency or ability. Scores were coded from 0 to 4 where higher scores reflected better functioning. Factor analysis identified the items retained in the final item bank of each scale. CAT simulations were conducted to estimate the mean score of each scale. The simulated CAT score and full item bank scores were compared based upon the score range, ceiling and floor effects, and marginal reliabilities. The child mean age was 3.0 ± 1.5 years (n = 500). Average burn size and time since burn injury were 4.2% TBSA and 1.1 years, respectively. Psychometric analysis resulted in eight scales: Physical, Communication and Language, Emotional Wellbeing, Mood, Anxiety, Peer Acceptance, Play, and Peer Relations. Ceiling effects were acceptable at <13% for all scales. Marginal reliabilities of the CATs were credible. The PS-LIBRE1-5 Profile CAT contains 111 items, and is a comprehensive measure that captures physical, communication and language, psychological, and social functioning of preschool burn survivors.

Indexed as

BurnsChildChild, PreschoolEducational StatusHumansInfantInterpersonal RelationsPsychometricsQuality of LifeSocial BehaviorSurveys and QuestionnairesSurvivorsburn injurychildrencomputerized adaptive testlife impact burn recovery evaluationpatient-reported outcome measure

Identifiers

PMID37703100
PMCPMC10872560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.