Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37703070›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2023

Understanding Whether and How a Digital Health Intervention Improves Transition Care for Emerging Adults Living With Type 1 Diabetes: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Realist Evaluation.

Ruoxi Wang, Geneviève Rouleau, Gillian Lynn Booth, Anne-Sophie Brazeau, Noor El-Dassouki, Madison Taylor, Joseph A Cafazzo, Marley Greenberg, Meranda Nakhla, Rayzel Shulman and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Evaluating the SEND eHealth Application to Improve Patients' Secure Message Writing.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Ruoxi WangInstitute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9695-0582
Geneviève RouleauInstitute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1093-6577
Gillian Lynn BoothMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2769-6522
Anne-Sophie BrazeauSchool of Human Nutrition, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2699-2920
Noor El-DassoukiCentre for Digital Therapeutics, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9607-4068
Madison TaylorCentre for Digital Therapeutics, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2360-9895
Joseph A CafazzoInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3114-4440
Marley GreenbergDepartment of Philosophy, Joint Centre for Bioethics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7678-8699
Meranda NakhlaDivision of Endocrinology, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5833-5303
Rayzel Shulman *Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9943-1529
Laura Desveaux *Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3429-1865
University of Toronto · CAUniversity Health Network · CAMcGill University · CAMontreal Children's Hospital · CATrillium Health Centre · CAWomen's College Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmerging adults living with type 1 diabetes (T1D) face a series of challenges with self-management and decreased health system engagement, leading to an increased risk of acute complications and hospital admissions. Effective and scalable strategies are needed to support this population to transfer seamlessly from pediatric to adult care with sufficient self-management capability. While digital health interventions for T1D self-management are a promising strategy, it remains unclear which elements work, how, and for which groups of individuals.

objectiveThis study aims to evaluate the design and implementation of a multicomponent SMS text message-based digital health intervention to support emerging adults living with T1D in real-world settings. The objectives are to identify the intervention components and associated mechanisms that support user engagement and T1D health care transition experiences and determine the individual characteristics that influence the implementation process.

methodsWe used a realist evaluation embedded alongside a randomized controlled trial, which uses a sequential mixed methods design to analyze data from multiple sources, including intervention usage data, patient-reported outcomes, and realist interviews. In step 1, we conducted a document analysis to develop a program theory that outlines the hypothesized relationships among "individual-level contextual factors, intervention components and features, mechanisms, and outcomes," with special attention paid to user engagement. Among them, intervention components and features depict 10 core characteristics such as transition support information, problem-solving information, and real-time interactivity. The proximal outcomes of interest include user engagement, self-efficacy, and negative emotions, whereas the distal outcomes of interest include transition readiness, self-blood glucose monitoring behaviors, and blood glucose. In step 2, we plan to conduct semistructured realist interviews with the randomized controlled trial's intervention-arm participants to test the hypothesized "context-intervention-mechanism-outcome" configurations. In step 3, we plan to triangulate all sources of data using a coincidence analysis to identify the necessary combinations of factors that determine whether and how the desired outcomes are achieved and use these insights to consolidate the program theory.

resultsFor step 1 analysis, we have developed the initial program theory and the corresponding data collection plan. For step 2 analysis, participant enrollment for the randomized controlled trial started in January 2023. Participant enrollment for this realist evaluation was anticipated to start in July 2023 and continue until we reached thematic saturation or achieved informational power.

conclusionsBeyond contributing to knowledge on the multiple pathways that lead to successful engagement with a digital health intervention as well as target outcomes in T1D care transitions, embedding the realist evaluation alongside the trial may inform real-time intervention refinement to improve user engagement and transition experiences. The knowledge gained from this study may inform the design, implementation, and evaluation of future digital health interventions that aim to improve transition experiences. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/46115.

Indexed as

digital healthemerging adultsrealist evaluationself-managementtransition to adult caretype 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID37703070
PMCPMC10534286
OpenAlexW4385160359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.