Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37703048›Full record

Trial reportMilitary medicine2024

Telemedicine-Guided Two-Incision Lower Leg Fasciotomy Performed by Combat Medics During Tactical Combat Casualty Care: A Feasibility Study.

P W Stark, B L S Borger van der Burg, O J F van Waes, T T C F van Dongen, Wouter, Marnalg Casper, R Hoencamp

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Military medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

P W StarkTrauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland 3015 GD, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2860-1276
B L S Borger van der BurgDepartment of Surgery, Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp, Zuid-Holland 2353 GA, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1199-4042
O J F van WaesTrauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland 3015 GD, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7690-9937
T T C F van DongenDepartment of Surgery, Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp, Zuid-Holland 2353 GA, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8172-5545
WouterDefense Healthcare Organization, Ministry of Defense, Den Haag, Zuid-Holland 2511 CB, The Netherlands.
Marnalg CasperDefense Healthcare Organization, Ministry of Defense, Den Haag, Zuid-Holland 2511 CB, The Netherlands.
R HoencampTrauma Research Unit, Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland 3015 GD, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1253-673X
Erasmus MC · NLMinistry of Defence · NLAlrijne Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

Karel Doorman Fund 19-0068Ministerie van Defensie 19-0068Stichting ZiektekostenVerzekering Krijgsmacht 19-0068
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDuring tactical combat casualty care, life- and limb-saving procedures might also be performed by combat medics. This study assesses whether it is feasible to use a head-mounted display (HMD) to provide telemedicine (TM) support from a consulted senior surgeon for combat medics when performing a two-incision lower leg fasciotomy. MATERIALS AND

methodsNine combat medics were randomized into groups to perform a two-incision lower leg fasciotomy. One group used the Vuzix M400 and the second group used the RealWear HMT-1Z1. A third, control, group received no guidance. In the Vuzix M400 group and RealWear HMT-1Z1 group, a senior surgeon examined the results after the two-incision lower leg fasciotomy was finished to assess the release of compartments, possible collateral damage, and performance of the combat medics. In the control group, these results were examined by a surgical resident with expertise in two-incision lower leg fasciotomies. The resident's operative performance questionnaire was used to score the performance of the combat medics. The telehealth usability questionnaire was used to evaluate the usability of the HMDs as perceived by the combat medics.

resultsCombat medics using an HMD were considered competent in performing a two-incision lower leg fasciotomy (Vuzix: median 3 [range 0], RealWear: median 3 [range 1]). These combat medics had a significantly better score in their ability to adapt to anatomical variances compared to the control group (Vuzix: median 3 [range 0], RealWear: median 3 [range 0], control: median 1 [range 0]; P = .018). Combat medics using an HMD were faster than combat medics in the control group (Vuzix: mean 14:14 [SD 3:41], RealWear: mean 15:42 [SD 1:58], control: mean 17:45 [SD 2:02]; P = .340). The overall satisfaction with both HMDs was 5 out of 7 (Vuzix: median 5 [range 0], RealWear: median 5 [range 1]; P = .317).

conclusionsThis study shows that it is feasible to use an HMD to provide TM support performance from a consulted senior surgeon for combat medics when performing a two-incision lower leg fasciotomy. The results of this study suggest that TM support might be useful for combat medics during tactical combat casualty care when performing life- and limb-saving procedures.

Indexed as

FasciotomyTelemedicineCombat MedicsFeasibility StudiesHumansLeg

Identifiers

PMID37703048
PMCPMC10898936
OpenAlexW4386703948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.